Works Durations and Notice Periods |
The notice period required for works in the highway is dependent upon these factors; |
The duration of the works. |
Whether the works form part of a forward programme of other works. |
Whether the works subject to a Temporary Traffic Regulatory Order (T.R.O) i.e. a temporary road closure. |
Whether the proposed Works are Urgent or Emergency (as prescribed in the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991). |
Whether the Works are on a 'Traffic Sensitive' Street. |
Notice period requirements are:- |
Immediate - Urgent or Immediate - Emergency; 2 hours after actual start |
Minor works – 1 to 3 working days duration, 3 working days’ notice period is required. |
Standard works – 4 to 10 working days duration, 10 working days’ notice period is required. |
Major works –
i.e. works that are 11 working days or greater, are on a 'Traffic
Sensitive' street, require a T.R.O. |
All works noticing must follow the sequence set out below for each category of notice; these are:- |
Immediate - Emergency, Immediate - Urgent; In progress, works stop and reinstatement registration. |
Minor works; 3 day proposed, In progress, works stop and reinstatement registration. |
Standard works; 10 day proposed, In progress, works stop and reinstatement registration. |
Major works; 3 month proposed (PAA), 10 day proposed, In progress, works stop and reinstatement registration. |
Template notices are attached in 'tabs' at the bottom of this page. |
The notice periods are the minimum required. |
The works start notice must be submitted within 24 hours of commencing work on site. |
The works end notice must be submitted within 24 hours of completing work on site. |
The reinstatement registration must be submitted within 10 working days of works completion - please note NYC are not required to register their own works. |
This noticing requirement is legislated under The New Roads and Street Works Act 1991. |
Failure to comply may result in the issue of a Fixed Penalty Notice (£120), or the issue of court proceedings which, upon conviction, may be subject to a fine of up to £2500. |
|
Please note that when a notice is submitted, the NYC Area Office need to know the exact location of the works as this is required to be plotted on the electronic Street Works Register map. |
Providing only the
name of the road you are working on is not enough information to
satisfy the noticing requirements of NRSWA; |
Please ensure that you complete all sections of the notice in full, including details of any traffic management, contractor contact details etc. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Certification Schemes
MARKED SCHEMES
KITEMARK
Certification body BSI Quality Assurance
PO Box 375
Milton Keynes
MK14 6LL
Section Title |
Reference |
Material |
Usage checked |
01 |
Preliminaries |
||
|
|||
02 |
Site Clearance |
||
|
|||
05 |
Drainage and Service Ducts |
||
|
BS EN
295-1:2013 |
Vitrified Clay |
Surface Water Drainage |
BS EN
295-1:2013 |
Vitrified Clay |
Filter Drains |
|
BS 5911-1:2021 BS EN 1916:2002 |
Concrete |
Surface Water |
|
BS EN
13598-1:2020 |
PVC-U |
Surface Water |
|
BS EN
13598-1:2020 |
PVC-U |
Filter Drains |
|
BS EN 1852-1:2018+A1:2022 HAPAS approved or BBA |
Plastic |
Surface Water |
|
BS EN
1852-1:2018+A1:2022 |
Plastic |
Filter Drains |
|
BS 4962:1989 |
Plastic |
Field Drains |
|
BS EN 13242:2002 +A1:2007 Clause 5.2 table 9 |
Natural or recycled Coarse Aggregate |
Pipe Bedding |
|
BS EN 1916:2002 |
Concrete |
Pipe Beds and Surrounds |
|
SHW Series 500
BS EN 13285:2018 |
|
Backfill Material
|
|
BS EN 5911-3:2022 |
Concrete |
Manholes and Chambers |
|
BS EN 124(1-6):2015 |
|
Gully Frames |
|
BS 5911-6:2021 |
|
Road Gullies and Gully Cover Slabs |
|
BS EN 10255:2004 BS EN 10025:2004 BS EN ISO 1461:2022 BS 4211:2005 +A1:2008 |
|
Hand Rails and Ladders |
|
BS EN 771-1:2011+A1:2015 |
Masonry |
Brick Manholes |
|
|
|||
06 |
Earthworks |
||
|
|||
07 |
Road Pavements |
||
|
SHW Series 600 |
|
Capping Layer |
SHW Series 700 |
|
|
|
BS 812 |
Material Testing |
Capping Layer |
|
BS EN 1097-5:2008 |
Material Testing |
Water Content |
|
SHW Series 800 |
Material Testing |
Unbound Granular Material
|
|
BS 1377-2:2022
|
Material Testing |
Sieve Tests |
|
BS EN 1097-2:2020 |
Material Testing |
Los Angeles Coefficient |
|
BS EN 1367-2:2009
BS EN 1744-1:2009 +A1:2012 |
Material Testing |
Magnesium Sulphate |
|
BS 812-124:2009 |
Material Testing |
Heave Value |
|
DMRB CD 226 |
Pavement Design |
|
|
DMRB CD 236 |
Material Testing |
Skid Resistance
|
|
DMRB CS 228 |
Material Testing |
Skid Resistance
|
|
BS EN 13108-4:2016
SHW Series 900 |
Material |
Hot Rolled Asphalt Surface Coat |
|
BS 594987:2015+A1:2017 |
Delivery, laying and Compaction |
|
|
BS EN 12591:2009
BS EN 13924-1:2015 |
Material |
Binder |
|
BS EN 13108-4:2016 |
Material |
Binder coat to Chippings |
|
BS EN 13108-1:2016 |
Material |
Asphalt
Concrete |
|
BS EN 13108-21:2016 |
Production Control |
All Bituminous Materials |
|
BS EN 13808:2013
BS EN 15322:2013
BS EN 14023:2010
|
Material |
Hot Applied Bond Coat |
|
BS EN 12272-1:2002 |
Application |
Spread Rates |
|
BS 594987:2015+A1:2017 |
Application |
Recommendations for laying |
|
BS 434-1:2011+A1:2016 |
Application |
Bitumen Road Emulsions
|
|
BS EN 13036-1 |
Material Testing |
Texture depths |
|
BS EN 1338:2003
BS 7533-3:2005+A1:2009 |
Material |
Concrete Block Paving |
|
BS EN 16236:2018
BS EN 933-1:2012 |
Material |
Kiln Dried Sand |
|
|
|||
11 |
Kerbs Footways and Paved Areas |
||
|
BS EN 1340:2003 |
Material |
Pre Cast Concrete Kerbs, Channels & Paving |
BS EN 1341:2012 |
Material |
Natural Stone Kerbs |
|
BS EN 771-1:2011 +A1:2015 |
Material |
Blue Brick Channels |
|
BS EN 1433:2002 |
Material |
Combined Kerb and Drainage Systems |
|
BS 1881-108 |
Testing |
Compressive Strength |
|
BS EN 13108 |
Material |
Foot/Cycle way Surfacing |
|
BS 594987:2015+A1:2017 |
Application |
Compaction Flexible Surfacing |
|
BS EN 16236:2018
BS EN 933-1:2012 |
Material |
Kiln Dried Sand |
|
|
|||
12 |
Road Markings and Traffic Signs |
||
|
BS EN 12899-1:2007 |
Material |
Sign Plates |
BS EN 12899-3:2007 |
Material |
Sign Plate Reflectorisation |
|
BS EN ISO 1461:2022 |
Material |
Posts Hot Dip Galvanised |
|
BS EN 12767:2019 |
Material |
Posts Passively Safe |
|
BS EN 12899-1:2007 |
Design / Material |
Post Foundations |
|
BS EN 1463-1:2021 |
Material |
Road Markings Thermoplastic |
|
BS 3262-3:1989 |
Application |
Road Marking Laying |
|
BS 1436 : 2018 BS 4800:2011 |
Material Colour |
Yellow Lines Lemon - general Primrose – Conservation Areas |
|
BS EN 1463-1:2021 |
Material |
Thermoplastic Tape |
|
BS EN 1436:2018 |
Material |
Reflective Road Studs Crossing Studs |
|
BS 8442:2022 |
Material |
Bitumen Grout |
|
|
|||
13 |
Road Lighting |
||
|
|||
17 |
Concrete and Mortar |
||
|
BRE Special Digest 363 (2005) |
Material |
Concrete Grades |
BS 8500:2015+A2:2019 |
Material |
Concrete |
|
BS EN 206:2013+A2:2022 |
Material |
Aggregate |
|
BS EN 12390-1:2021 BS EN 12390-2:2019 |
Testing |
Concrete |
|
BS EN 206:2013+A2:2021 |
Material |
Air Entrained Concrete |
|
BS 4449:2005+A3:2016 |
Material |
Reinforcement round bar |
|
BS 4483:2005 |
Material |
Mesh Reinforcement |
|
BS 1881-131:1998
|
Testing |
Compressive Strength of Standard or Prescribed mixes. |
|
BS EN197-1:2011 |
Material |
Portland Cement |
|
BS EN 998-2:2016 |
Material |
Mortar |
|
|
|||
22 |
Bridges |
||
|
|||
26 |
Miscellaneous Items |
||
|
|||
30 |
Landscape |
||
|
BS 3882:2015 |
Material |
Topsoil |
BS 3969:1998+A1:2013 |
Material |
Turf |
|
|
BRITISH BOARD OF Agrément
ROADS AND BRIDGES CERTIFICATES
British Board of Agrément British Board of Agrément
Bucknalls Lane, 1 Mann Island,
Watford, 3rd floor,
Herts WD25 9BA Liverpool, L3 1BP 9BA
Types of work, goods or materials for which proprietary product are required to have a British Board of Agrément Roads and Bridges Certificate are as follows.
Description |
Specification Clause |
Pipes for drainage and or service ducts other than listed in section 2.01 |
2 |
Permanent shuttering for road gullies |
2 |
Fin drains and constituent materials for edge of pavement drainage |
2 |
Details of products conforming to the above requirements are listed in the index of current BBA Publications which may be obtained from their web site.
Road Lighting Equipment
Contact the Road Lighting
Department on Tel: 01609 780780 or email RoadLighting@northyorks.gov.uk
for the latest
information regarding the Specification for Street Lighting
equipment.
APPROVED PLANTING
SCHEDULE OF SHRUBS FOR GROUND COVER PLANTING IN VERGES
BOTANICAL NAME |
COMMON NAME |
HEIGHT (m) |
Berberis candidula |
Barberry Family |
0.5 |
Berberis thundergii (atropurpuren Nana) |
|
0.5 |
Calluna (in variety) |
Ling |
0.5 |
Ceanothus prostratus |
|
0.5 |
Cornus canadensis |
Creeping Dogwood |
0.3 |
Cotoneaster dammeri |
Cotoneaster family |
0.5 |
Cotoneaster horizontalis |
|
0.5 |
Cotoneaster microphyllus |
|
0.5 |
Cotoneaster salicifolius (Repens) |
|
0.5 |
Cotoneaster (Skogholm) |
|
0.5 |
Cytisus x beanii |
Broom Family |
0.3 |
Cytisus x kewensis |
|
0.5 |
Erica (in variety) |
Heather |
0.5 |
Euonymus fortune (Radicans in variety) |
|
0.5 |
Gaultheria srocumbens |
Checkerberry |
0.3 |
Genista sydia |
|
0.5 |
Genista hispanica |
Spanish Gorse |
0.5 |
Hebe albicans |
Shrubby Veronica Family |
0.5 |
Hebe armstrongii |
|
0.5 |
Hebe (Carl Teschner) |
|
0.5 |
Hebe pinguifolia (Pagei) |
|
0.3 |
Hedera canariensis (in variety) |
Canary Island Ivy |
0.3 |
Hypericum calycinum |
Rose of Sharon |
0.5 |
Juniperus communis (Honbrookii) |
Juniper Family |
0.5 |
Juniperus horizontalis |
|
0.5 |
Lavandula spica (Hidcote) |
Lavender |
0.5 |
Pachusandra terminalis |
|
0.5 |
Roas (Max Graf) |
|
0.5 |
Vinca major (in variety) |
Greater Periwinkle |
0.3 |
Vinca minor (in variety) |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
FOR TREES SEE NYC Guide
Trees within New Developments in the Highway 2015
Trees within New Developments in the Highway
Guidance for developers wishing to plant trees in the highway within North Yorkshire
Document Control |
Date |
Version |
Comment |
Final Document |
Jan 2015 |
1.0 |
Approved |
Title |
Trees within New Development in the Highway |
Document Type |
Protocol |
Author |
Neil Leighton |
Approved By (including date) |
D Bowe & BES Exec Members (30/1/15) |
Approval Date |
30 January 2015 |
Issue Date |
1 February 2015 |
Review Date |
February 2018 |
Reviewing Officer |
Network Strategy Manager |
Links to other NYC documents |
Management of Existing Trees in the Highway |
Introduction
Trees within the highway setting will cause various specific maintenance issues throughout the life of the tree. This guidance therefore is intended to help ensure that only suitable species of trees are planted, appropriate consideration is given towards their protection within the highway setting when highway works are programmed, and that trees are located within appropriate locations. In addition guidance is included for the management of existing trees located within new development sites.
Scope
This guidance is designed for use by anyone who wishes to plant trees within the highway (and prospectively maintainable highway) as part of new developments. For clarity this document uses the term ‘developer’ to include designer, agent, developer, contractor or sub-contractor etc. The Council has a separate related document for the ‘Management of existing Trees in the highway’. In addition, it will be used by those officers who examine applications which include trees in the highway (and prospectively maintainable highway). Not applicable for Principal Roads where Design Manual for Roads and Bridges will apply.
Legislation and Standards
No specific legislation exists regarding the planting of trees within the highway other than the general powers to plant, covered by the Highways Act 1980 sections 64, 96, 141 & 142. A list of related standards is provided within this document at section 21 ‘References’.
Policy Statement
This document has been developed with the primary aim of providing guidance to those developers who design prospectively maintainable highways, in order to ensure a consistent councilwide approach to tree selection and planting, ground work considerations within close proximity to trees, and tree aftercare procedures.
Equality Impact Assessment
Equality Impact Assessment not required. This decision will be re-visited at document review.
Table of Contents
7 Nursery stock – Standards and quality
10 Specifically excluded Tree Species
11 Preservation of existing site trees during development.
15 Causes of damage to trees during construction works
16 Tree surgery and site aftercare
17 Installing highway equipment
Appendix a: Example Commuted Sum calculation for 100 highway trees
1.1 If the Council is to adopt areas of soft landscaping, it is essential that developers follow industry recognised standards of practice so that soft landscape schemes become well established. The design of any soft landscape area should ensure that long-term maintenance requirements are appropriate and practical as well as being a sensible investment. Developers can achieve this by providing sufficient space for new planting to enable the plants develop to full maturity without the need for too much intervention. Providing adequate space between the planting area and adjoining buildings (both existing and proposed) is also important to ensure that both can exist together.
1.2 It is essential that developers engage the services of a chartered landscape architect for professional advice on all landscape design (both hard and soft area) matters relating to new developments.
1.3 All planting needs to be carefully selected taking into consideration the size it will grow to. This applies particularly to trees and includes both the canopy spread of the tree and the root system. As well as providing adequate space for trees to grow, developers need to consider the effect trees will have on the existing surroundings such as nearby buildings or walls. A tree’s demand for water can have a direct impact on the existing soil conditions dependent upon soil profile, water demand categorisation of the tree itself, and a trees access to soil moisture in other areas. Developers should not underestimate the effects of soil heave and shrinkage - there are guidelines on tree planting and recommended appropriate foundation depths within NHBC Standards Chapter 4.2 Building near trees.
1.4 If shallow rooting trees are the preferred species choice, then consideration should be given to the inclusion of root deflectors within the tree pit design and construction. Without the inclusion of appropriate consideration of root impacts at the design stage then it is likely that future issues with roots disturbing tarmac and other hard surfaces may arise. In most cases trees must not be planted within 1.5m of any footway and 2.5m of any road which is intended to become highway maintainable at public expense.
1.5 With careful planning and the inclusion of appropriate engineering solutions at the design stage, developers should be able to include well-designed and effective soft landscape areas in the layout of a new development without significantly affecting the space available and the potential for developing the site. Areas of open space, grass verges and public gardens are all potential sites for a wide range of planting. However, in the design and construction of soft landscape areas the following points should be taken into consideration. These landscape areas may not necessarily preclude tree planting but may require consideration of engineering solutions or appropriate species to suit the site constraints:
Classification of roads - dual carriageway, main road, estate road, country lane etc.
Visibility - on the inside of bends, from junctions, from house driveways, to road signs etc.
Existence of service runs - overhead cables, streetlights, underground cables and pipes, drains etc must not be adversely affected by trees, their roots and future growth.
Aerial space - how close the trees and shrubs are, above ground, to roads, accesses, neighbouring houses etc.
Subterranean space - how much root-sustaining soil is available and how close hostile ground conditions (such as concrete and compacted aggregate) are.
How great the risk of damage to footways, boundary walls, kerbs etc.
Soil quality - fertility, pH, compaction, plasticity, drainage and possible waterlogging etc.
Plant characteristics - tall, bushy, compact, columnar, spreading, prostrate, evergreen or deciduous etc.
Tree and shrub habit - mature height and spread, growth characteristics of roots and crown, suckering etc.
Seasonal features - seed production, shade density, leaf fall, flowering etc.
Aesthetic qualities - leaf colour, flowering, bark, shape etc.
Light levels - daylight, aspect, obstruction of street lights etc.
1.6 The type of planting that can be used in landscape schemes will depend on the available space. Open spaces at the centre of a development may be considered for tree planting where trees may become a focal point (for example, village greens or public squares).
1.7 Large open spaces are ideal for planting larger groups of trees (the design and species mix can be provided by the consultant landscape architect), whereas wide verges on either side of a road provide an opportunity for planting avenue trees. Shrub planting can provide low-level screening, particularly where there is a need to restrict visibility (for example, for traffic calming). With the planting of trees and shrubs in a new development, the design should include features which will allow for their successful establishment and potential growth characteristics such as the typical form and habit of the plant species.
1.8 Informal areas of open space such as screen bunds provide an opportunity to establish areas of structure planting which can provide effective screening and, eventually, mature shrub and woodland areas. In more restricted spaces, there is an opportunity to consider planting small to medium sized trees or shrubs. The design of this type of planting can utilise native species and this can ensure that long-term maintenance requirements are kept to a minimum. The use of shrub beds with ornamental species is not permitted due to the future maintenance costs usually being high and this type of planting often acts as a litter trap.
1.9 The Council will normally adopt well-designed and planted soft landscape on verges and other highway-related land providing that developers pay a commuted sum derived using the North Yorkshire Council Highways Commuted Sums procedure to cover long-term maintenance. (A sample Commuted Sum for 100 trees is included as appendix).
1.10 The Council will not adopt new planting within a development if plants are either dead, dying, stressed or failing to establish due to poor design and planting establishment methods.
1.11 The Council will not permit the planting of any tree species which has the potential to grow to a girth of 250mm (measured 0.3m above ground level) within 4.5m of any road which may be categorised as an A or B road. Reference must be made to the Council’s Passive Safety Protocol (available on the Council website at www.northyorks.gov.uk).
2.1 Developers should be aware that the presence of trees can affect the performance of any Street Lighting installation in the highway. The root system of trees can also potentially have a damaging effect on underground cabling networks. Therefore, great care should be taken when siting trees in lit Highways.
2.2 In general terms, the developer will need to address the number of trees relative to the lighting units and the potential adverse effects on the performance of the lighting system. For example, large trees can reduce the effectiveness of a lighting system. Where lighting units are located, trees should be planted as far away as possible from street lighting locations and in all cases no closer than 10 metres from any lighting unit. It is important to ensure the lighting system is designed alongside selecting the location for any trees (including trees outside the highway where canopy or roots may also affect the street lighting) to ensure no conflicts arise.
2.3 The planting of trees can cast areas of shading across the highway and as a consequence may result in the increase in the number of lighting units to mitigate against these areas of shadow. Developers should note that a commuted sum will be payable for any extra over lighting units required as a consequence of trees, this will also apply for trees which may be planted outside the highway but where the canopy affects the lighting design.
3.1 Developers must be aware that the presence of trees may affect the performance of any Sustainable Drainage System (SuDS). The root system of trees tends to grow along the path of least resistance and will tend to grow more vigorously in disturbed soil. Tree root systems have the potential to enter a SuDS project and extend their roots throughout the system
3.2 Tree root infestation into SuDS can be prevented to a large degree by the use of root barrier membranes which should be provided when the tree pits are constructed prior to the new trees being planted.
3.1 Existing trees cannot usually cope with the retro-fitting of a root barrier membrane. The root spread of existing trees (usually accepted as a circle of radius at least equivalent to the height of the full grown tree) must be kept outside the permeable area around any SuDS features (about five metres) eg any SuDS should be placed outside the Root Protection Area (RPA) of any existing trees. This is likely to be up to 25metres for trees which when fully grown could reach a height of 20 metres.
4.1 As well as considering the amount of space available for new planting above the ground, it is equally important to assess the condition and extent of the soil or other planting medium. During the construction period, existing top soils and sub soil can become damaged by compaction and contamination. It is essential that the handling of soils should comply with the Construction Code of Practice for the Sustainable Use of Soils on Construction Sites published by DEFRA. Compacted soil can become starved of oxygen (anaerobic), which is essential to the survival of plant roots. Oxygen if removed from the soil cannot be reversed and the soil structure becomes permanently damaged. The quality of the soil should be investigated in accordance with the DEFRA guidance and BS4428: 1989 and where it is contaminated, it should be removed from the site. Where the topsoil falls below the quality criteria it should be ameliorated in accordance with the standard. The use of imported top soil should be avoided since this is costly and not sustainable. The application of organic surface mulch such as pulverised bark to a planting area is always required as this will help retain soil moisture, suppress weed growth and encourage the colonisation of soil organisms (mycorrhizae) which are beneficial to plant roots.
4.2 A soil analysis in accordance with BS4428 will be required before planning or designing any new soft landscape areas and amelioration to remedy inadequate soil content and structure is essential. The planting of trees and shrubs into poor quality sub soil and top soil- will result in lack of plant establishment
4.3 Developers should ensure that any hard surfaces in close proximity to the planting areas are designed and constructed to provide a robust edge with appropriate foundations design with bedding and haunch details. The sub-base construction should be constructed to suit the potential load bearing capacity of the paved area (i.e. vehicle or pedestrian). The use of root deflectors can minimise the risk of root migration and potential damage to adjoining paved areas as a precautionary measure, but the design and construction of the paved area should meet the loading bearing capacity and have a suitably designed edge restraint to British and European Standards BS EN 1338 to 1344 and the Building Regulations. Root barriers consist of an artificial barrier placed round the tree, which then deflects root development downwards and away from vulnerable surfaces. Hard surfaces should be permeable to allow drainage and oxygen penetration to the soil below. Alternatively, the use of enclosed cellular root containing systems can be incorporated into schemes to ensure roots are contained without interference with utility apparatus etc.
Figure 3 Planting in hard-surfaced areas
4.4 This is a complicated process with many aspects to consider. To ensure that new planting survives and forms a beneficial co-existence within the new development, it is essential that the correct species are selected for the site. This will normally require the submission of a landscape scheme and/or input from a chartered Landscape Architect and Arboriculturist. It is important that the developer takes into account the potential mature size of the selected plant species to ensure there is sufficient space and the planting is not likely to unnecessarily encroach into other areas of the development (for example, roads, accesses, houses etc.)
4.5 With tree planting, in particular, the potential size, shape, growth habit and leaf and flower qualities of the tree species must be appropriate for the site and soil conditions. A qualified Landscape Architect must provide the Landscaping scheme details.
4.6 In rural areas, developers should use native plant species to integrate the development into the surrounding countryside and reflect the landscape character of the area. The landscape character of the area is set out in three tiers of landscape character assessment, which exists at National level, council level and district level.
4.7 The list of tree and shrub species in Table 1 is a guide and suggests a range of appropriate uses. Table 2 provides a list of tree species that must be avoided.
4.8 Developers should seek professional advice from a chartered landscape architect when selecting species. This will ensure that new planting is suitable for the site and soil conditions and is appropriate to the particular location.
Figure 1 Poor tree selection. Tree already interfering with highway space and property eaves.
5.1 To ensure plants can become properly established, the planting area should be suitable and well prepared, and the plants should be carefully handled so they arrive at the site in the best condition. The Code of Practice for Plant Handling published by the Joint Council for Landscape Industries (JCLI) should be used. It is also important that plants are well planted in accordance with BS 4428: Code of practice for general landscape operations. As a general guidance trees should be planted in a prepared pit, which is 50% larger than root-ball of the tree. The sides of the planting pit should be forked over to help alleviate compaction and allow for the tree roots to become established. Trees should be planted with the root collar at the same level as the surrounding soil levels, with the tree pit backfilled with approved topsoil clean of building contaminants. Trees should be staked, tied and mulched at the time of planting. Trees should be anchored with a single stake angled at 45 degrees and attached the trunk of the tree with a tie at circa 1 metre above ground level. The stake shall be driven into the ground clear of the root-ball. The stake and tie should be removed no sooner than following a minimum of 2 growing seasons. In all cases tree procurement and planting should be in line with the recommendations of BS 8545 Trees: from nursery to independence in the landscape; Recommendations.
5.2 Any trees to be planted within the highway will be not of less than ‘heavy standard’ specification (120-140mm girth at 1m above ground level). Tree planting pits must be a minimum of 1m3 in size, with topsoil retained for backfilling around the roots incorporating 50:50 tree planting medium. A proprietary root barrier (or containment) system must be incorporated within the planting pit to remove the risk of future root disruption to surrounding surfaces and structures. The use of a tree guard to protect the tree from accidental damage and vandalism is advised in urban areas. Trees must be mulched at the base to a depth of 75mm and topped up each year during the establishment period to suppress weed growth and retain moisture.
5.3 Any trees which fail to establish during the first three years shall be replaced by the developer by a species of equivalent specification at the time of planting and replacement shall take place during the next available planting season (November to March) during suitable weather conditions.
5.4 Tree species selection should take into account aesthetic interest, biodiversity opportunities and the need to reduce the potential impact of bacterial and fungal infections.
5.5 In avenue planting, trees must not be planted in opposite locations across the highway and must be planted alternately to allow for sufficient establishment space. This will also enhance sunlight penetration and provide dappled light rather than full shade.
6.1 Soft landscape works must be successfully established before they are adopted by the local authority and schemes must be designed to ensure that long-term maintenance is kept to a minimum. Developers will be required to pay a commuted sum as a contribution towards the future maintenance costs.
6.2 After planting, developers should ensure a full maintenance specification to include the removal of weeds, adjustment of tree ties and guards, pruning and when necessary, watering of plants to ensure satisfactory establishment. This should be a minimum of three years. The development should include a full landscape specification that includes a maintenance programme covering the three year period to ensure that new landscaping reaches its potential and fully complements the new development. This programme should include any making good trees associated with any vandalism, theft or other damage which may be evident.
6.3 Maintenance works must meet the relevant British Standards and should always relate to a specific scheme. For example, establishing an avenue of heavy standard trees planted in a grass verge is very different to establishing a forestry plantation.
7.1 All nursery stock used in the landscape scheme should be sourced from appropriate suppliers and should meet the requirements of the National Plant Specification and the following British Standard (BS) specifications.
BS 3936: Part 1 Nursery stock (Specification for trees and shrubs)
BS 3936: Part 4 Nursery stock (Specification for forest trees, poplars and willows)
BS 3936: Part 9 Nursery stock (Specification for bulbs, corms and tubers)
BS 3936: Part 100 Nursery stock (Specification for ground cover plants)
BS 8545: Trees: from nursery through to independence in the landscape - Recommendations
7.2 All plant stock should be suitably protected when being handled at the supplying nursery, during transport and while being stored on the site. As well as protecting the stock against any physical damage while being handled, it is essential that the roots of all bare-rooted stock are covered, kept moist and not allowed to dry out. If roots dry out the fine root hairs, which absorb moisture from the soil, are destroyed and this can quickly lead to the decline and death of the plant.
8.1 All materials used in the landscape scheme and all associated construction practices and workmanship should comply with the appropriate British Standard specification or Code of Practice issued by the British Standards Institution or European Code of Practice.
8.2 Other British Standards relevant to landscaping works include:
BS 3882: Specification for topsoil and requirements for use.
BS 4428: Code of practice for general landscape operations (excluding hard surfaces)
BS 7370: part1: Grounds maintenance part 1. Recommendations for establishing and managing grounds maintenance organisations and design considerations
BS 7370: part2: Grounds maintenance part 2. Recommendations for the maintenance of hard areas (excluding sports surfaces)
BS 7370: part3: Grounds maintenance part 3. Recommendations for maintenance of amenity and functional turf (other than sports turf)
BS 7370: part4: Grounds maintenance part 4. Recommendations for maintenance of soft landscape (other than amenity turf)
BS 8545: Trees: from nursery through to independence in the landscape - Recommendations
Species |
Common name |
Crown shape |
Mature crown spread/m (ie space reqd) |
Characteristics and uses |
Acer campestre: 'Elsrijk' 'Queen Elizabeth' |
Field Maple |
Spreading |
10 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 4 metres - good autumn colour |
Acer platanoides Cleveland' |
Norway Maple |
Spreading |
18 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces - prone to shedding branches - good autumn colour |
Acer rubrum 'Scanlon' |
Red Maple |
Fastigiate |
6 |
Medium Tree - erect cultivar suitable for verges wider than 2 metres - excellent autumn colour |
Aesculus hippocastanum 'Baumanii' |
Horse Chestnut |
Spreading |
20 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces - 'Baumanii' - does not produce conkers |
Alnus cordata |
Italian Alder |
Conical |
14 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 3 metres - long period in leaf |
Alnus glutinosa 'Imperialis' |
Common Alder |
Conical |
14 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces and poor soils |
Alnus incana 'Aurea' |
Grey Alder |
Conical |
14 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces and poor soils |
Amelanchier laevis |
Snowy Mespilus |
Spreading |
8 |
Small Tree - suitable for gardens and open spaces. - spring flowering and excellent autumn colour |
Betula pendula 'Dalecarlica' 'Tristis' |
Swedish Birch |
Conical |
14 |
Medium Tree - suitable for gardens, open spaces and verges wider than 3 metres |
Betula utilis ’Jjaquemontii’ |
Himalayan Birch |
Conical |
14 |
Medium Tree - suitable for gardens, open spaces and verges wider than 3 metres |
Carpinus betulus |
Hornbeam |
Spreading |
16 |
Large Tree - suitable
for open spaces |
Carpinus betulus fastigiata ‘Frans Fontaine’ |
Fastigiate Hornbeam |
Columnar |
12 |
Tight form suitable for area with limited available space as well as open space sites |
Castanea sativa |
Sweet Chestnut |
Spreading |
20 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces |
Corylus colurna |
Turkish Hazel |
Columnar |
12 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 5 metres |
Cotoneaster cornubia |
Tree Cotoneaster |
Spreading |
8 |
Small Tree - semi evergreen - suitable for verges wider than 4 metres |
Crataegus crus-galli |
Cockspur Thorn |
Spreading |
8 |
Small Tree - suitable for gardens, open spaces and verges wider than 4 metres - good autumn colour |
Crataegus monogyna |
Hawthorn |
Spreading |
8 |
Small Tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 4 metres |
Crataegus prunifolia |
Broad Leafed Cockspur Thorn |
Spreading |
8 |
Small Tree - suitable for gardens, open spaces and verges wider than 4 metres - good autumn colour - produces large thorns |
Fagus sylvatica |
Beech |
Spreading |
20 |
Large Tree - suitable
for open spaces - casts heavy shade |
Ginkgo biloba |
Maidenhair Tree |
Conical |
14 |
Medium tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 3 metres |
Juglans regia |
Walnut |
Spreading |
18 |
Medium to Large Tree - suitable for open spaces |
Larix decidua |
European Larch |
Conical |
8 |
Large Deciduous Conifer - suitable for open spaces |
Malus species 'Golden Hornet' ‘Floribunda’ 'John Downie' |
Crab Apple |
Spreading |
8 |
Small tree - suitable
for open spaces and verges wider than 3 metres - |
Malus trilobata |
Erect Crab |
Columnar |
6 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces, gardens and verges wider than 2 metres |
Pinus sylvestris 'Argentea' |
Scots Pine |
Conical |
10 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces |
Pinus nigra 'Austriaca' |
Austrian Pine |
Conical |
12 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces |
Platanus x hispanica |
London Plane |
Spreading |
20 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces |
Prunus x hillieri 'Spire' |
Erect Cherry |
Columnar |
8 |
Medium Tree - suitable for verges wider than 2 metres - ensure it is produced on a non-suckering rootstock |
Prunus padus 'Albertii' |
Bird Cherry |
Spreading |
14 |
Medium tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 3 metres |
Prunus subhirtella 'Autumnalis' |
Autumn Cherry |
Spreading |
8 |
Small to Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces and large gardens |
Prunus sargentii 'Rancho' |
Sargents Cherry |
Columnar |
6 |
Small to Medium Tree - suitable for verges wider than 2 metres |
Prunus 'Snowgoose’ |
Flowering Cherry |
Columnar |
8 |
Medium Tree - suitable for verges wider than 2 metres - ensure it is produced on a non-suckering rootstock |
Pyrus calleryana 'Chanticleer' |
Callery Pear |
Spreading |
10 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 3 metres |
Pyrus communis 'Beech Hill' |
Erect Common Pear |
Columnar |
6 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 2 metres |
Pyrus salicifolia 'Pendula' |
Willow Leafed Pear |
Weeping |
5 |
Small Tree - suitable for gardens |
Quercus robur |
English Oak |
Spreading |
20 |
Large Tree - suitable
for open spaces |
Quercus robur ‘Koster’ |
Fastigiate oak |
Columnar |
12 |
Tight form suitable for area with limited available space as well as open space sites |
Quercus rubra |
Red Oak |
Spreading |
18 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces |
Sorbus aria 'Lutescens' |
Whitebeam |
Spreading |
10 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces and large gardens |
Sorbus aucuparia
'Sheerwater Seedling' |
Rowan |
Spreading |
8 |
Small to Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces, gardens and verges wider than 2 metres |
Sorbus intermedia |
Swedish Whitebeam |
Spreading |
10 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces |
Sorbus thurungiaca 'Fastigiata' |
Rowan/ Whitebeam Hybrid |
Broad Columnar |
8 |
Medium Tree - suitable for open spaces and verges wider than 3 metres |
Tilia x euchlora |
Caucasian Lime |
Spreading |
18 |
Large Tree - suitable for open spaces - does not secrete honeydew |
Thuja plicata |
Western Red Cedar |
Columnar |
10 |
Large Evergreen Conifer - suitable for open spaces |
Table 1
Common Name |
Species |
Problems/Characteristics |
Silver Maple |
Acer saccharinum |
Weak branch unions - prone to wind damage |
Raywoods Ash |
Fraxinus angustifolia Raywood’ |
Weak branch unions - prone to wind damage |
False Acacia |
Robinia pseudoacacia |
Weak branch unions - tends to sucker |
Poplars |
All species |
Vigorous invasive root growth - brittle wood - tends to sucker |
Willow |
All species |
Vigorous invasive root growth - brittle wood |
Laburnum |
Laburnum anagyroides |
Produces poisonous seeds |
Yew |
Taxus baccata |
Produces poisonous seeds |
Sumach |
Rhus typhina |
Tends to sucker |
Common Ash |
Fraxinus excelsior |
Weak branch unions - prone to wind damage |
Manna Ash |
Fraxinus ornus |
Weak branch unions - prone to wind damage |
Sycamore |
Acer pseudoplatanus |
Not suitable near parking areas. |
Wild Cherry |
Prunus avium |
Not suitable close to gardens and hard surfaces. |
Small Leaved Lime |
Tilia cordata |
Not suitable close to buildings or parking areas. |
Broad Leaved Lime |
Tilia platyphyllos |
Not suitable close to buildings or parking areas. |
Table 2
11.1 Trees are an important feature in our urban and rural landscapes and make a significant contribution to the character and landscape quality of our area. They play an important role in providing screening, filtering traffic noise and absorbing dust and other pollutants. Trees on or next to the highway can be severely damaged by construction and maintenance work to roads and footways. However, damage can be limited, and in many cases prevented, by following the guidelines contained in this document. The guidelines cover design principles and site practices, which, if followed, protect existing trees within new projects.
11.2 Wherever possible, our policy is to retain, preserve and protect existing healthy trees when carrying out road construction and maintenance work. A large number of trees are lost each year due to a wide range of development and so it is important that existing trees are retained.
11.3 It is good practice to retain healthy, semi-mature and mature specimens with significant life potential rather than struggle to retain over-mature specimens with limited life expectancy (apart from oak, which in a dying state as veteran trees are invaluable). Protection measures must always follow best practice guidance. Developers should ensure that contractors put them in place before the construction work commences and maintain them until the works are complete. Inadequate or half-hearted protection measures are not cost effective and can lead to significant damage to trees, which may only become apparent months or years after the works are complete. A damaged or deteriorating tree can present a significant danger to users of the highway.
12.1 Trees are complex living organisms which can be adversely affected by direct or indirect damage caused during construction work. Even minor changes to their living environment can affect growth and establishment. As the tree forms a trunk and crown above the ground it also produces a root system below ground which supports the crown. Tree roots need to absorb oxygen to survive, so most of a tree’s root system is found in the aerobic (oxygen-rich) soil within the 600mm immediately below the surface. The tree’s roots absorb nutrients and moisture from the soil and can extend well beyond the area taken up by its crown.
12.2 Water and nutrients are transported from the roots, up the trunk and into the crown of the tree through tissues called xylem vessels which lie just below the tree’s bark. Similarly, carbohydrate produced by the tree’s leaves is transported through phloem vessels down the tree to its trunk and roots, where it combines with absorbed oxygen to produce food energy which, in turn, supports future growth. Water lost through the tree’s leaves is also replaced by moisture absorbed through its root system and transported through the tree.
12.3 Consequently the tree’s roots and its trunk and crown above ground are interdependent and even minor damage to one can badly affect the other.
Figure 6: Tree form and function
13.1 Highway construction projects should allow for all healthy existing trees and where appropriate, the planting of new trees. Developers should involve a consultant Arboriculturalist or chartered landscape architect who can advise at the planning, design and construction phases on the protection of the existing trees and the planting of new species. The potential growth of retained trees must be considered, their future compatibility with new and existing highway works and how near new and existing service runs will be placed. An appropriate root protection area (RPA) should be identified around the retained trees, and the scheme should exclude this area from the construction site. British Standard BS 5837 sets out the requirements for tree protection and implications for trees. All necessary tree maintenance work, both before and after construction, should be carried out by trained operatives to British Standards BS 3998.
13.2 When planting new trees, developers should consider their future growth and habit and the development should include design features which allow for their growth.
13.3 Developers must carry out a survey of the construction site at the planning stage before the design of the development or improvement works have commenced. The survey must include details of both the site levels and individual trees and may require all or some of the following information in line with BS 5837:
British Standard Tree Survey
Arboricultural Implication Assessment (AIA)
Tree Protection Plan (TPP)
Arboricultural Method Statement (AMS)
A scaled plan showing the location and identification of all trees, shrubs and hedges on site.
Any existing Tree Preservation Orders or conservation area status.
Other relevant site features such as watercourses, street lighting and CCTV poles, adjacent walls and fences, hard surfaces and so on.
Details of ground levels as a basis for avoiding changes to soil levels around retained trees.
Locations of trees on adjoining land which might be affected by the works.
Details of site drainage which may be altered or interrupted by the proposed works and which may, as a result, affect retained trees.
Site features with a high nature-conservation value.
Details of other site features such as service runs (for ducts, utility apparatus and drainage) and how close they are to the trees.
13.4 Detailed information on the species, health, condition and status of each tree should be collected and assessed by an appropriately qualified and experienced Arboriculturalist.
14.1 When designing a new development, wherever it is safe and practical, the design should incorporate existing trees worth retaining into the overall layout to provide a mature and established character. For the most part, important trees within such sites may have already been made the subject of a Tree Preservation Order.
14.2 Trees within the development site should be assessed in accordance with the recommendations included in British Standard (BS) 5837: ‘Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction - Recommendations’. The assessment should cover their condition, significance and landscape and environmental value and potential. The tree survey should classify each tree into one of the retention categories below.
14.3 Where there is a conflict between retaining a category A or B tree and ensuring road safety, the first option should be to amend the proposed design to avoid the conflict and retain the tree. The Council will consider situations where it is not reasonable or practical to do this on a site-by-site basis.
A) Trees to be retained – high category
Trees in this category:
Are prominent, healthy trees of good form and habit;
Have high historical and commemorative value;
Are botanically valuable (because of their species) or rare; or
Are older trees with high nature-conservation value and long life potential which pose little or no danger to users of the highway and the surrounding locality.
B) Trees where retention is desirable moderate category
Trees in this category are:
Healthy young trees of good form with substantial life potential; or
Healthy mature trees of reasonable form with moderate life potential.
C) Trees which could be retained – low category
Trees in this category are:
Mature trees in reasonable condition with some life potential; or
Less prominent young trees in reasonable condition.
D) Trees which should be removed – fell category
Trees in this category are:
Dangerous or unstable;
Dead;
Likely to become unstable after others are removed; or
Less prominent, over-mature trees with limited life potential.
14.4 Developers should plan or design the roadwork’s or new development to ensure all category A and B trees are retained and, where possible, category C trees. However, developers should not impair road safety or access to the development.
15.1 The following activities are common causes of damage to trees when construction is carried out within the trees’ natural rooting area.
Activity |
Damage caused |
Excavating trenches |
To install and maintain services, for foundations, kerbing and so on. Root severance. |
Alterations in soil level |
Raising or lowering the soil level can alter the nutrient and oxygen context of the soil. |
Installing non-porous surfaces |
Affects soil aeration and drainage. |
Compacting the surface |
By plant, vehicles and storing material. One run across the root-plate of a tree by a vehicle can be detrimental to its long term viability and health |
Soil pollution and direct salt damage |
Storing toxic material (for example, diesel oil and road salt) within the root protection area (RPA), but runs and spills may also migrate from surrounding areas. |
Physical damage |
By plant and machinery to a tree’s roots, trunk and branches. |
Changes to soil hydrology |
Caused by changes to drainage or alteration of soil gradients, which accelerates water run-off or compacts the soil which causes waterlogging. |
Fires |
Burning unwanted material within the tree’s root spread can cause significant damage to the tree’s roots, trunk and branches. |
Exposure |
Damage or whole tree failure caused by increased levels of sunlight and wind when neighbouring trees are removed. |
Figure 7: Damage to trees during construction works
15.2 A tree’s root system can extend radially (outwards) to a distance much greater than the tree’s height. The trees RPA can be calculated by using BS 5837: 2012. The whole of this area should be protected and remain undisturbed during construction work. If works are necessary within the tree’s potential rooting area then reference should be given to the recommendations of BS 5837 and should be underpinned by an Arboricultural Method Statement (AMS) and agreed by the relevant Local Planning Authority Arboriculturalist. The RPA should be protected with substantial fencing (see below) and be excluded from the construction site. If works are necessary within the protection zone, developers must consult a qualified Arboriculturalist at the design and implementation stages to identify specific measures to minimise damage. This will normally require submission of an AMS to be prior agreed by the LPA At this stage developers should also consider the potential effects of the works on privately-owned trees next to the site.
Figure 8: Protective fencing to be employed in all circumstances as BS5837 Fencing is to be erected as shown below.
Examples of above-ground stabilizing systems
15.3 On larger schemes where trees are retained within the site area, protective fencing must be erected, as specified in Figure 8, before the works begin. This fencing should stay up until all the work is complete and all materials, plant, vehicles and spoil have been removed from site. It is essential that the tree protection zone is excluded from the construction site and all associated activities including excavations and changes of soil level. Areas where machinery, materials, chemicals and waste material are stored should also be excluded from the protection zone.
15.4 However, due to the linear nature of many highway maintenance operations (for example, kerbing) and the fact that most highway corridors are narrow, it is not always possible to exclude a tree’s protection zone from the work area. In such cases developers should adopt the following specific measures to minimise the effects of the works:
Adhere to the recommendations of British Standards BS 5837
Adhere to the guidelines of NJUG 10
Before starting the work a survey team should identify the protection zone with marker paint or pegs. This will ensure that the construction operatives are fully familiar with the protected area where special precautions are required to avoid or minimise damage.
The trunk of each tree shall be protected with industry hoarding, supported on scaffolding, to a height of at least two metres, to protect its bark from mechanical damage. This protection should be reusable so that as work progresses, it can be transferred from tree to tree.
15.5 If the work needs surfaces to be removed or excavated, this should be carried out as follows:
Footways – Slabs or paving should be removed manually, but initial layers of concrete or tarmacadam should be removed using a hand-held breaker. All sub-base material should then be removed using hand tools only.
Carriageways – Tree roots do not usually penetrate the road base, binder course or surface course and may only be present in the sub-base material below the carriageway. This means the road base, binder course and surface course can be removed by machine. The compacted sub-base material below may initially be broken using a hand-held breaker but all material, once broken, should be excavated carefully using hand tools only.
15.6 All excavations using hand tools need to be carried out with great care to minimise tree damaging activity. There needs to be close supervision during hand-digging operations and all site staff should understand what is required. All tree roots over 25mm in diameter should ideally be protected and retained. If, however, it is necessary to remove these roots, developers should seek a recognised consultant for Arboriculturalist advice. Any root cutting should be done with a sharp handsaw or secateurs and the size of the wound should be kept to a minimum. Individual roots of less than 25mm may be severed, but mats of smaller roots (including fibrous roots) should be retained. Smaller roots can easily dry out and die when exposed, particularly in warm or windy conditions. These should be covered and protected with damp hessian until the excavation is back filled.
15.7 Where kerbs are being installed or refitted through a root protection area and roots with a diameter of more than 25mm obstruct the work, developers should consult a consultant a recognised Arboriculturalist before agreeing on potentially severing the roots. If the root cannot be severed without putting the stability of the tree in danger, developers should consider:
Reducing the section of kerb;
Creating a gap in the kerb to allow for the root;
Bridging the kerb over the root; or
Constructing a kerbside build-out.
15.8 Developers should take particular care when backfilling excavations within the root protection area. Tree roots are particularly affected when soil is compacted and they can also be damaged by the mechanical action of tamping down. Backfill material around exposed roots should consist of a fine granular material which provides a high proportion of air space. Developers must not use ‘general’ sand which may be toxic to tree roots. The material should be compacted using hand-tamping methods which maintain a degree of aeration and enable tree roots to survive. This method will allow the backfill material to be compacted to the required level for footway construction. Compacting a road base close to tree roots is more complex due to the load-bearing requirements of a road. If a road carriageway is to be constructed within a tree’s root protection area and tree roots more than 25mm are present, developers should consult a recognised arboriculturalist to identify the special measures required to protect tree roots during construction. Non-paved areas should be backfilled using the previously excavated soil which should be only lightly firmed and left proud to allow for natural settlement.
15.9 To survive, tree roots require water and oxygen to be present within the soil. Surface material should also be flexible to allow for future soil heave and root growth. Granular surfacing, such as gravel chippings or other permeable materials, laid on to a geo-textile membrane may be appropriate, but maintenance considerations should be taken into account.
15.10 Any service runs or street furniture within a tree’s protection area should adopt hand-dig methods to ensure that all roots with a diameter of more than 25mm are retained. Developers should follow the recommendations contained in NJUG 10: ‘Guidelines for the Planning, Installation and Maintenance of Utility Services in Proximity to Trees’. Developers should contact a consultant Arboriculturalist for specific advice.
15.11 Where development is being carried out during winter months care must be taken to avoid any tree root contact with rock salt as this can be especially harmful.
15.12 Residual chemical herbicides should not be present in construction materials to be used within a tree’s root protection area as these may be potentially absorbed by the tree roots and have a significant toxic effect.
16.1 In some instances, it may be necessary to carry out tree surgery in the first stage of the works to accommodate access to the site and prevent physical damage occurring to nearby trees.
16.2 Tree surgery may also be necessary after the work is complete to repair any minor damage which has occurred. Tree surgery should always be carried out in accordance with BS 3998: Tree work-Recommendations. A qualified and appropriately insured tree-work contractor who is skilled in modern Arboricultural techniques should only be used. If damage has occurred to the site during the construction works, techniques such as soil aeration and surface mulching with an organic material (for example, pulverised bark) could be beneficial to improve the soil and allow the tree to recover from any disturbance.
17.1 When designing and planning highway equipment, developers should consider the location of nearby trees, whether they are on the highway or on nearby property. Care should be taken to avoid installing any equipment within the tree’s root protection area and within its crown or potential growing space. Developers must site equipment such as road signs, street lights, CCTV camera poles, walls, fences and so on to avoid damage to trees during installation and to avoid the need for regular pruning to maintain visibility.
17.2 Developers must take particular care when siting SuDS systems in the vicinity of trees (see 3).
18.1 When carrying out development work near to trees, it is essential that staff working on the site adopt all measures identified to retain trees and minimise damage. All site personnel must establish good communication and identify the project requirements for retaining trees. It is important that all recognised practices and tree protection methods as set out in accordance with the relevant, current British and European Standards are followed.
19.1 The Council will only adopt trees that have been successfully retained on verges and other highway land providing developers pay a commuted sum to cover their long-term maintenance. The Council will not adopt any tree retained within a development if the Council is aware that it has been damaged by poor practice during construction and the appropriate protection measures have not been adopted.
19.2 Trees which will not be adopted must be identified by developers and their maintenance arranged with adjacent property owners to ensure future clarity of maintenance responsibility.
Tree survey complete (include identify TPO trees) |
|
Existing high-category and moderate-category trees (and, where possible, low-category trees) have been retained in the scheme. |
|
Root Protection Areas (RPA) excluded from the construction area using approved protective fencing. |
|
No excavations or alterations to soil levels within the tree’s root protection area. |
|
Arboriculturalist consulted if works need to take place in a root protection area. |
|
Arboricultural contractor to carry out tree surgery in the first phase of the project. |
|
Recognised Codes of Practice and specific recommendations followed when working within root protection areas. |
|
Reinstate and improve the site (for example, soil aeration and mulching) after works completion, where appropriate. |
|
No storage of construction materials or toxic substances (including road salt) or light fires within a tree root protection area. |
|
No operation of vehicles or plant within a tree root protection area. |
|
Permeable surfaces installed over disturbed ground within a tree root protection area. |
|
No houses built within close proximity to root protection area. |
BS 3936: Nursery stock
BS 3882: Specification for topsoil and requirements for use.
BS 4428: Code of practice for general landscape operations
BS 5837: Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction - Recommendations
BS 7370: Grounds maintenance
BS 3998: Recommendations for tree work
BS 5837: Trees in relation to construction
BS 8545 Trees: from nursery through to independence in the landscape.
National Joint Utilities Group – NJUG 10 – Guidelines for the planning, installation and maintenance of utility services in proximity to trees
Arboricultural Practice Note 1 – Driveways close to trees
This guidance is based upon ‘The 6Cs Design Guide’ which deals with highways and transportation infrastructure for new developments in Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Nottingham.
The Council recognises the contribution made by Harrogate Borough Council is its consultation feedback.
Appendix G
|
Please note: Form to be completed and returned to development.inspections@northyorks.gov.uk no later than 10am the preceding Friday. |
||||
W/C |
|
Proposed Weekly Work Schedule |
|||
|
|
|
|||
Site Info |
Developer: |
|
Location Inc. Post Code: |
|
|
Contractor: |
|
||||
Contact/s |
|
||||
|
Proposed Works |
Drawing Ref/Specification Clauses |
|||
Monday |
|
|
|||
Tuesday |
|
|
|||
Wednesday |
|
|
|||
Thursday |
|
|
|||
Friday |
|
|
|||
Saturday |
|
|
|||
Sunday |
|
|
|||
Any other info |
|
Signature [on behalf of Developer] |
|||
|
Failure to submit notification will result in Highways Authority being unable to undertake site inspections. If there is any changes to the schedule the Highways Authority should be notified. |
||||
Site Works - Notifiable items (All of the below should be included on your weekly site dairy when undertaken) Please note Red items must be inspected prior to covering/backfill and need to be left open for the min 48 hr. period after notice has been given ( See NYC Specification for more detail on standards and notice ) |
|||
Work item |
Works Code |
NYC Specification for Housing & Industrial Estate Roads & Private Street Works |
|
|
|
Section/s |
Standard detail Dwg No/s |
FORMATION |
FO |
4.01 (2), 4.02 3.06 |
|
BULK FILL |
BF |
3.04 |
|
HIGHWAY DRAINAGE |
HD |
2.0 - 2.21 |
C1-C7 |
GULLY CONNECTIONS |
GC |
2.15 |
|
GULLIES |
GU |
2.13 |
C5,C6 |
BRICK WORK (TO IRONWORK) |
BW |
2.19 9.0 – 9.04 |
C1 – C6 |
IRON WORK |
IW |
2.14 & 2.11 |
C1 – C6 |
DUCTS |
DU |
2.01 / I |
|
CAPPING |
CA |
4.01 (2), 4.03, 4.05, 4.06 3.06 |
A1,A2 |
SUB-BASE (Type 1) |
SB |
4.04, 4.05,4.06 4.07 |
A1, A2 |
KERB & CHANNEL FOUNDATION |
KCF |
5.06 |
A1, A2 |
KERBS (inc temp edge restraint works) |
KE |
5.01- 5.04 5.07 & 5.09 |
B1 – B4 |
CHANNELS |
CH |
5.01, 5.02, 5.06, 5.07 |
B1 – B4 |
UTILITY SERVICES (Backfill) |
US |
2.11 5.08 |
D1 |
EDGINGS |
ED |
5.12 |
B5 |
FOOTWAY SUBBASE |
FSB |
5.08, 5.09 |
A1, A2 |
FW BINDER LAYER |
FBL |
5.10 |
A1, A2 |
FOOTWAY SURFACING |
FS |
5.10 |
A1, A2 |
VISIBILITY SPLAYS |
VS |
To approved plans |
|
ROAD, BASE |
RB |
4.01,4.09 & 4.14-.17 |
A1,A2 |
ROAD, BINDER LAYER |
RBL |
4.01,4.09 & 4.14-.17 |
A1, A2 |
ROAD, SURFACING (including surfacing preparation) |
RS (SP) |
4.01,4.09 & 4.14-4.17 |
A1,A2 |
BLOCK PAVING PREP |
BPP |
4.18 |
A3 |
BLOCK PAVING |
BP |
4.18 |
A3 |
TACTILE SURFACES |
TS |
To current NYC requirements/details 5.11 |
|
LINING |
LI |
6.05 |
|
SIGNING |
SI |
6.01 - 6.04 |
G1,G2 |
LIGHTING |
LG |
7.0 (& Highway Lighting Dept. req) |
F1 |
LANDSCAPING |
LA |
9.0 |
|
Development Management Recycled materials - advice note
Recycled Aggregates: compliance requirements for any recycled materials to be used within the adoptable works on all S278 & S38 works within North Yorkshire.
This briefing note relates to the recycled aggregate aspect only and is in addition to the standard material performance certs required to meet the specific clause for each material
Type 1 Sub-base to Specification for Highway Works (SHW) Clause 801 & 803
Recycled coarse aggregate and recycled concrete aggregate used in unbound mixtures in accordance with Clause 803 shall also comply with the additional requirements of Table 8/3 below
Table 8/3
Unbound Mixture |
Type 1 |
Component Identified by Clause 710 (See below) |
Maximum Permitted Content (% by mass) |
Asphalt (Class Ra) |
50 |
Glass (Class Rg) |
25 |
Other materials (Class X), including wood, plastic and metal |
1 |
Capping Material to SHW series 600, Table 6/1- Class 6F5
Where ‘recycled aggregate’ is used in Series 600, the material shall be aggregate resulting from the processing of inorganic or mineral material previously used in construction and shall have been tested in accordance with Clause 710. It shall not contain more than 1% other materials (Class X), not more than 50% in Class Ra (bituminous materials) and not more than 25% in Class Rg (crushed glass). Where ‘recycled aggregate’ is imported onto the site, it shall be aggregate complying with BS EN 13242 from source code A (construction and demolition recycling industries).
Where ‘recycled aggregate except recycled asphalt’ is used in Series 600, the aggregate shall have been tested in accordance with Clause 710. It shall not contain more than 1% other materials (Class X), not more than 1% in Class Ra (bituminous materials) and not more than 5% in Class Rg (crushed glass). Where ‘recycled aggregate except recycled asphalt’ is imported onto the site, it shall be aggregate complying with BS EN 13242 from source codes A2 (crushed concrete) and/or A3 (crushed bricks, masonry).
Pipe Bedding Material to Clause 503 (SHW)
Where recycled coarse aggregate or recycled concrete aggregate is used in this Clause, it shall have been tested in accordance with Clause 710 and shall not contain more than 1% other materials (Class X).
710 Testing for Constituent Materials in Recycled Aggregate and Recycled Concrete Aggregate
1 This Clause specifies the basic procedure and test methods for the examination of recycled aggregate
And recycled concrete aggregate for the purpose of identifying and quantifying constituent materials.
Quality Control Procedure
2 The quality control procedure shall be in accordance with the ‘Quality Protocol for the production of
Aggregates from inert waste’ and the ‘Producers’ compliance checklist’ published by Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP). The results of all quality control checks carried out by the Contractor shall be compiled in accordance with the procedure set down in the above document and with those in this Clause. These shall be delivered promptly to the Overseeing Organisation on request.
Test Method
3 The constituents of a sample of recycled aggregate shall be classified by hand-sorting the coarse
Aggregate particles in accordance with BS EN 933-11. The test shall be carried out by a suitably trained laboratory technician who has demonstrated competence in classifying the constituent classes in accordance with the test method.
Note – All recycled materials brought onto site for intended use within the adoptable works shall be supported fully by the documentation requirements referred to in this advice note, the material shall be stockpiled ready for further visual inspection before use, at this time the Authority may request further testing before use from the stockpile should there be any concerns regarding the material quality,
NYC – Development Management
July 2019
|
Your ref: |
|
|
Development & Flood Management Highways & Transportation County Hall, Northallerton, North Yorkshire DL7 8AH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our ref: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tel: 01609 780 780 |
Contact: Date |
|
|
e-mail: development.control@northyorks.gov.uk www.northyorks.gov.uk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Sirs
DEVELOPMENT AT -
Developer – All sites
North Yorkshire Council (NYC) as Local Highway Authority (LHA) is committed to working closely with your company to deliver the road works at the above site and achieve:
· The highest quality development possible;
· Efficient and effective delivery of projects for the benefit of all parties;
· Development that is not a financial burden or maintenance liability to NYC
· The delivery of adoptable highway works constructed to the required standards;
To achieve this communication is key. Your company is fully responsible for the day-to-day supervision of the road works construction on the site. The LHA will only inspect the works to check that they are being constructed in accordance with the approved drawings and the LHA’s other requirements and specification. These LHA visits do not free you from your responsibility for supervising the work and making sure that it is carried out in a proper and safe manner, and in line with the specification.
Before you start you should ensure you have all the necessary permissions for works associated with road construction and a full set of approved drawings and specification on site. The permissions may include the following as site conditions dictate:
…………..Continued
· A valid planning permission
· A signed Section 278 or Section 38 Agreement as appropriate
· The necessary Streetworks permits and notices
· Approval for any traffic management to be used
· A programme for delivering the roadwork’s
· A provision for receiving deliveries and storing materials clear of the highway
· Parking provision for operatives
· Measures to control the spread of mud onto the highway
· Agreed HGV delivery routes.
Your road works must be constructed by a contractor/ground-worker who has relevant experience and capabilities. However, you need to demonstrate to the LHA how you intend to:
· Make yourself fully aware of the engineering quality and standards of workmanship
required by the LHA; and
· Quality control and manage the works being delivered on your site.
NYC does not expect your contractor/ground-worker to operate unsupervised by your company on site.
Pre-start meetings will be required to establish and emphasise the LHA’s position and your responsibilities on a number of issues including those identified in this letter. Initially this will be between the LHA and your company to discuss issues including:
· Personnel and responsibilities;
· Construction site management and traffic control;
· Streetworks Authorisations;
· Communications
· Agreed start date.
A formal agenda is available on request and will be issued prior to the meeting.
A further meeting will take place between the LHA’s Highways Officer, yourself and your contractor to discuss day to day issues including:
· Communications
· Workmanship and standards;
· Materials and Testing;
· Setting Out.
The Highways Officer will also advise which elements of work will require prior notice to enable inspection to be carried out. You should note that without prior notification of your need for the Highways Officer to inspect key items resources may not permit a site visit on your required date. This may result in additional destructive testing to prove the acceptability of the works in question. You should consequently ensure you give adequate notice for all inspections required.
…………Continued
To assist with programming inspections the Developer’s site manager will be required to submit a weekly report indicating the following week’s programme of adoptable highway works, prior to noon on the preceding Friday. Please note if a sheet is not submitted, visits to the site will not be scheduled by the LHA. Scheduled visits will always be given priority and consequently the LHA may not be able to visit your site when you wish. Where you undertake works without inspection, you work at risk. You will be required to uncover or open up any uninspected part of the works to prove acceptability and permit necessary testing and remove and make good any materials or parts of the works which are, in the opinion of the LHA, defective.
It is of paramount importance that existing roads and accesses to adjacent houses, buildings etc. adjacent to the site are kept clear of obstruction, clean and clear of mud and material dropped from vehicles. Mud, slurry or material brought onto the road as a result of carrying out the works shall be removed immediately by brushing or other approved means. If required by NYC to ensure the
Cleanliness of the highway wheel washers shall be installed and used by every vehicle leaving the site.
If we work together on these matters adoptable roadwork’s can swiftly progress to formal maintenance periods with a minimum of hassle for all. We appreciate your co-operation in these matters.
Yours faithfully
Team Leader Transport and Development
DEVELOPERS CHECK LIST FOR A NEW ACCESS, ENRANCE OR PUBLIC HIGHWAY JOINING THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY
Requirements check list. (Please note, the verge between the carriageway edge and the site boundary generally forms part of the Highway, and makes this applicable)
Item |
Required unless otherwise agreed |
Date/approved/agreed |
1 Planning consent |
|
|
2 Section 38/278 agreement |
|
|
3 Pre-agreement (Form6PA) |
|
|
Section 184 licence needed if no 2 or 3 |
|
|
Approved Drawing |
|
|
Approved construction details |
|
|
Approval of materials |
|
|
Site pre-start meeting with D M O or Engineer |
|
|
Street works notices completed and on the system |
|
|
Approval of Traffic management |
|
|
Signage for site access & 24 hour contact telephone number |
|
|
Advance notice of works for public. |
|
|
Details of contractors street works accreditation |
|
|
Proof of public liability insurance |
|
|
Details of wheel washing/ sweeping measures |
|
|
It is an offence under Section 131 of the Highways Act 1980 to work in the Public Highway without the Authorities Permission.
APPENDIX K
Your ref: |
|
|
|
Our ref: 101004 Contact: 01609 780780
|
|
North Yorkshire Council Customer Resolution Centre East Block County Hall Northallerton DL7 8AD |
|
15 May 2017 |
|
Tel: 01609 780780 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Sir/Madam,
|
|
|
|
Highways Act 1980 – Section 154
OVERHANGING VEGETATION –
We understand that you may be the owner or occupier of the above property. It has come to the attention of the Highway Authority that a tree along this route is growing in such a way as to overhang the public highway and cause an obstruction to the passage of large vehicles.
Please arrange to trim the tree in question within the next 14 days so as to remove the overhanging vegetation. For your information, a minimum clearance of 5.2 metres (17’0”) above the carriageway and 2.3 metres (7’6”) above any footpath or highway verge is required. If you fail to carry out this work within the period of fourteen days the Council may carry out the work itself and recover from you the expenses reasonable incurred in doing so, in accordance with Section 154 of the Highways Act 1980.
Your attention is also drawn to the provisions of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 for protecting birds, their young and nests. Please ensure that you take reasonable steps to avoid destroying the nest of any wild bird which is in use or being built.
Should you have any queries regarding the work required, please contact this office via the above contact details.
I thank you in anticipation of your assistance.
13 ROAD HUMPS
May be used only in combination with diagram 557.2, 557.3 or 557.4, and with the marking to diagram 7062
File:Traffic signs manual-chapter-4-diagram 557x4 (2008).svg]]
These plates may be used only in combination with diagram 557. 7. The distance may be varied (see Appendix C) and on diagrams 557.3 and 557.4 may be omitted. The legend on diagram 557.4 may be on two lines. On diagrams 557.3 and 557.4 the arrow may be reversed, or a second arrow pointing in the opposite direction may be added. The arrow on diagram 557.4 may be omitted; the appropriate x-height will then be 50mm
13.1 Diagram 557.1 is used to warn of the presence of a road hump or a series of humps. It must be accompanied by one of the plates shown. The plates must not be used alone. However, no signs are required to warn of humps in a 20 mph zone signed with traffic signs to diagram 674 (Highways (Road Humps) Regulations 1999). Road hump signs will usually benefit from the relaxation from the direct lighting requirement described in para 1.37.
13.2 Figure 13-1 illustrates the range of signing that might be used where road humps are installed on adjacent roads within an area. Signs are needed at each entrance to the area, other than at short culs-de-sac with no humps and fewer than about 100 dwellings. If the humps are spaced more than 150 metres apart, each individual hump should be signed. Similar signing should be used where humps are installed on one road only.
13.3 Individual circumstances will determine whether signs for road humps should be provided on both sides of the road. Where a gateway is to be used as a speed-reducing feature in advance of humps, it is recommended that signs should be erected on both sides of the carriageway and incorporated into the gateway. Further advice on siting can be found in Appendix A.
13.4 Where several adjoining roads have humps, the distance on the sign plates should relate to the humps on the road on which the sign is erected. Separate signing for adjoining roads should not be necessary, provided the first hump in the adjoining road, whether it is the major or the minor one, is within 40 metres of the junction of the two roads.
13.5 As humps may be installed only on roads with speed control features, a 50 mm x-height is sufficient for the supplementary plate, 557.2. Diagrams 557.3 and 557.4 when incorporating an arrow indicate the presence of humps on side roads, and may themselves be used on roads where speeds are higher. A wider range of x-heights is therefore prescribed for these signs (see Annex B for details).
13.6 Signing of a humped Zebra or signaled crossing in a series of road humps will generally be necessary only if the spacing between it and adjacent humps is greater than 100 metres (see also para 9.13 for details of sign plates).
[NI1]Is this out of date?