|
Initial equality impact assessment screening form This form records an equality screening process to determine the relevance of equality to a proposal, and a decision whether or not a full EIA would be appropriate or proportionate.
|
||||
|
Directorate |
Environment |
|||
|
Service area |
Network strategy |
|||
|
Proposal being screened |
Increase fees for Permit scheme to cover additional staff costs |
|||
|
Officer(s) carrying out screening |
Alex Hollifield |
|||
|
What are you proposing to do? |
Seek approval to increase permit scheme fees to cover the cost of additional staff and undertake a joined-up recruitment process with the forthcoming Lane Rental Scheme if given approval by the DfT |
|||
|
Why are you proposing this? What are the desired outcomes? |
To ensure continued service delivery for the permit scheme as workload has increased, but resource has remained the same. Undertaking a recruitment campaign to recruit permit and lane rental staff is practical and strategic. |
|||
|
Does the proposal involve a significant commitment or removal of resources? Please give details. |
Yes, resource required for both the permit scheme and Lane Rental. Looking to recruit 5 FTE posts for Permit scheme and 4 FTE for Lane Rental |
|||
|
Impact on people with any of the following protected characteristics as defined by the Equality Act 2010, or NYC’s additional agreed characteristics As part of this assessment, please consider the following questions:
If for any characteristic it is considered that there is likely to be an adverse impact or you have ticked ‘Don’t know/no info available’, then a full EIA should be carried out where this is proportionate. You are advised to speak to your directorate representative for advice if you are in any doubt.
|
||||
|
Protected characteristic |
Potential for adverse impact |
Don’t know/No info available |
||
|
Yes |
No |
|||
|
Age |
|
X |
|
|
|
Disability |
|
X |
|
|
|
Sex |
|
X |
|
|
|
Race |
|
X |
|
|
|
Sexual orientation |
|
X |
|
|
|
Gender reassignment |
|
X |
|
|
|
Religion or belief |
|
X |
|
|
|
Pregnancy or maternity |
|
X |
|
|
|
Marriage or civil partnership |
|
X |
|
|
|
People in rural areas |
|
X |
|
|
|
People on a low income |
|
X |
|
|
|
Carer (unpaid family or friend) |
|
X |
|
|
|
Are from the Armed Forces Community |
|
X |
|
|
|
Does the proposal relate to an area where there are known inequalities/probable impacts (for example, disabled people’s access to public transport)? Please give details. |
N/A |
|||
|
Will the proposal have a significant effect on how other organisations operate? (for example, partners, funding criteria, etc.). Do any of these organisations support people with protected characteristics? Please explain why you have reached this conclusion. |
No- increase in resource for permit scheme should provide a higher level of service. Lane rental will have an impact on Undertakers themselves. Should drive positive behaviours in terms of working on site at non- disruptive times. Money generated from the scheme can also be used to make Highway Improvements to benefit the public.
|
|||
|
Decision (Please tick one option) |
EIA not relevant or proportionate: |
ü
|
Continue to full EIA: |
|
|
Reason for decision |
The proposal does not affect anyone with protected characteristics. Its purpose is to improve coordination of works. |
|||
|
Signed (Assistant Director or equivalent) |
Barrie Mason |
|||
|
Date |
16/09/2025 |
|||