RISK ASSESSMENT FORM

RISK ASSESSMENT DETAILS

RISK MATRIX & RATING

 

Directorate

Environment

Team

Parks and Grounds

 

 

Title of risk assessment

Devolution of Knaresborough Market to KTC

Details of activity: To harmonise the operation of the seven outdoor markets managed by North Yorkshire Council and thereby ceasing the subsidised stall set up service provided to stall holders at Knaresborough and Ripon markets.

 

Location of activity

Knaresborough marketplace

 

Date of assessment

29 May 2025

 

Name of person carrying out assessment

Jon Clubb, HoS Parks & Grounds

 

Person carrying out assessment’s signature

Jon Clubb

 

Name of employee(s) consulted on activity

Commercial Manager, Parks & Grounds

Senior Accounting Technician, Finance

Legal representative, Legal Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

POTENTIAL OUTCOME                                                               LIKELIHOOD

Catastrophic

Definite failure / highly significant costs

 

 

Highly likely

More likely to occur

Major

Possible failure / and major costs

                

Likely

Moderate

Likely issues or costs

 

Possible

 

Minor

Can cause issues or added costs

 

Unlikely

 

Insignificant

Minor impact

 

Remote

Less likely to occur

 

POTENTIAL OUTCOME

Catastrophic

 

 

 

 

 

Major

 

 

 

 

 

Moderate

 

 

 

 

 

Minor

 

 

 

 

 

Insignificant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remote

Unlikely

Possible

Likely

Highly Likely

                                                                               LIKELIHOOD                                         

 

 

 

 

 

Risk rating

Action

 

 

HIGH

Urgently review/add controls & monitor (if Likely or Highly Likely – stop work, seek competent advice)

 

 

MEDIUM      

Review/add controls (as far as reasonably practicable) & monitor

 

LOW

Monitor control measures

 

 

 

Risk identified

 

Risk

Control Measures

Residual

Risk

[RAG]

 

Further Control Measures - if required

Risk of stall set up not being successfully transferred or operated by KTC.

 

Med

 

[Likelihood = unlikely, Outcome = moderate]

Control: KTC have proposed to continue stall set up and have liaised with other markets and providers that have a similar operating model. NYC will work with KTC to support a smooth transition of this service.

Low

[Likelihood = remote, Outcome = moderate]

Control: N/A

Environment of change may lead to some traders given notice, temporarily impacting income levels.

 

Med

[Likelihood = possible, Outcome = moderate]

Control: Communicate with stall holders in partnership with KTC as soon as practicable once a firm decision has been made on devolution and set out next steps.

Low

[Likelihood = unlikely, Outcome = minor]

Control: N/A

KTC business case assumes a generally higher level of income (£70k) than has been achieved in the past few years (ave £60k) – leading to financial pressure.

Med

[Likelihood = likely, Outcome = moderate]

Control: KTC business case demonstrates financial robustness at lower income levels. Devolution enables greater flexibility to develop the market to best reflect needs of the local area.

Low

[Likelihood = possible, Outcome = minor]

Control: Ongoing promotion of markets to encourage self-set traders.

 


 

 

SUMMARY INFORMATION

 

 

The key risks identified centre on the overall environment of change created by the two priorities of markets harmonisation whilst simultaneously negotiating what could potentially be the first significant devolution pilot to successfully conclude. High levels of partnership working with consistent messaging to stakeholders will be required to mitigate risks. The development of this devolution pilot has fostered a strong sense of collaboration and any lessons learned can be shared with other devolution work. It is noted that recent historical income levels are slightly below that initially anticipated by KTC. However, there is headroom within the financial forecasts to accommodate this even before the benefits of local devolution are felt.

 

 

 

 

 

Scheduled date of next review

 

Are there any changes to the activity since the last review?

Date of review

Post implementation review – Oct 26

TBA