Stakeholder Consultation Survey
Responses
Retrofit Strategy
Consultation – Stakeholder Survey copy
Below is a copy of the
survey questions for the stakeholder version of the public
consultation on York and North Yorkshire’s draft Retrofit
Strategy.
Please either use this
paper version to draft your answers and input them to the survey
page, which can be found here, or return your filled out paper
copy to energy@yorknorthyorks-ca.gov.uk
or to York and North
Yorkshire Combined Authority, West Offices, Station Rise, York, YO1
6GA
If you have any
questions, please contact energy@yorknorthyorks-ca.gov.uk

York
and North Yorkshire Combined Authority - Retrofit Strategy
Consultation
|
York
and North Yorkshire Combined Authority (YNYCA) is developing its
Retrofit Strategy, a collaborative document aiming to increase the
pace and scale of retrofit in the York and North Yorkshire
region
As
of 2023, approximately 50,000 households were in fuel poverty in
York and North Yorkshire. 63% of homes and 57% of non-domestic
buildings are below EPC C, meaning that they are less energy
efficient which can result in higher energy bills, as well as being
too cold in winter and too hot in summer. We spend a lot of time in
our buildings, so this can also have a huge impact on physical and
mental health.
Retrofit
can change the picture, but to make sure this Strategy is right for
everyone in the region, we want to hear from
you
The
questionnaire should take no longer than 15minutes to
complete.
If
at any point you wish to go back to a previous question please use
the dedicated "previous page" button at the bottom of the page
rather than your browsers back button otherwise you may lose your
progress.
This
questionnaire will close at 11:59pm on 3 December
2025.
|
1.
York
and North Yorkshire Combined Authority will act in accordance with
our Privacy
notice.
Personal
data is being collected to help us to better understand the
responses, and will be used to assist analysis. All responses will
be anonymised.Do you agree to participate in YNYCA’s research
survey? Your data will be used in accordance with the privacy
notice linked above.
|
X
|
Yes, I agree to
participate
|
|
|
No, I do not agree to
participate
|
2.
Are
you responding as an individual/business or on behalf of an
organisation? If you’re not sure which version of the
consultation you should answer, please get in touch with:
energy@yorknorthyorks-ca.gov.uk
|
|
I want to share my personal views
as someone who could be affected by the Retrofit Strategy
(Individual or Business)
|
|
X
|
I want to share my
organisation’s views on retrofit and/or my organisation has a
role to play in retrofit (Organisation)
|
|
To
make sure this Strategy is right for everyone in the region, we
want to hear from key stakeholders.
The
consultation is open to any organisation based in or operating in
York and North Yorkshire that has a role in retrofit. This can be
across any element, such as skills, supply chain, social housing
providers, local authorities, community groups etc. There is also a
version of this survey specifically for the general public and
businesses. If you’re unsure which version of the survey to
answer, please get in touch with
energy@yorknorthyorks-ca.gov.uk.
You
may find it helpful to have the draft Retrofit Strategy open while
you answer this survey. You can view the draft Retrofit
Strategy
here.
|
3.
What
is the size of your organisation?
|
|
Micro (0 to
9)
|
|
|
Small (10 to
49)
|
|
|
Medium (50 to
249)
|
|
X
|
Large
(250+)
|
4.
We’d
like to know where your organisation is based.
DL78AD - County Hall
What’s
the
first half of
your postcode for your main workplace?
Please write in the first half of your postcode for example DL7 or
YO17. This information cannot be used to identify where your
organisation is, it only gives us a generalised idea of where you
are. If your organisation operates out of multiple workspaces
please use the postcode of your main office.
|
|
Prefer not to say
|
|
|
Postcode:
|
5.
What
is the name of your organisation?
6.
Please
provide a contact email address.
This will only be used if we need to contact you when, for example,
we need to clarify a response you have given. Your response answers
will remain anonymous in all finalised reports and
publications.
7.
Do
you consent to the name of your organisation being listed as
providing a response?
8.
To
what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
"I am supportive of York and North Yorkshire’s Retrofit
Strategy." The
draft Strategy can be found here.
|
X
|
Strongly agree
|
|
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
9.
Please
provide some detail for your answer.
|
NYC Officers have been engaged in
the development of the retrofit strategy. The draft retrofit
strategy demonstrates the potential for retrofit and ambition
within York and North Yorkshire.
The strategy’s ambition to
scale up retrofit delivery and secure additional funding is
strongly welcomed. Local authorities are fully committed to playing
their part and have already invested significant time and resources
into building experienced, resident-focused delivery teams. These
teams are well-placed to deliver retrofit at pace, particularly for
vulnerable households where trust, local knowledge, and tailored
support are essential.
However, it is important that the
strategy does not inadvertently slow progress by funnelling
existing funding through new centralised structures. While
centralised delivery may be effective for business-facing schemes,
resident-led retrofit requires a more agile, place-based approach.
Adding further layers of governance—such as routing funds
through the YNYCA—risks introducing delays and additional
reporting burdens that could undermine the effectiveness of local
delivery models.
Moreover, the ambition to deliver
67,000 domestic solar installations in just four years is
commendable, but without new and dedicated funding, it is unlikely
to be achievable. Simply redistributing existing resources will not
be sufficient to meet the scale of the challenge. The strategy
should focus on unlocking genuinely new funding and finance
options, while enabling local delivery partners to continue
building on the strong foundations already in place.
|
|
10.
To
what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
"The Retrofit Strategy has the right level of
ambition."
|
X
|
Strongly agree
|
|
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
11.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. This could include details
such as whether the level of ambition is too high or too
low.
|
The draft Retrofit Strategy
outlines the ‘Scale of Ambition’, which does not
identify targets but it is based on the York and North Yorkshire
leading the way pathway of assumptions.
The scale of ambition will not be
possible without additional funding that can support the strategy
delivery, utilising existing established delivery teams and
mechanisms. Additionally, the scale up of rooftop solar is very
ambitious and would require additional funding mechanisms to
support uptake.
|
|
12.
To
what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
"The Executive Summary adequately summarises the Strategy for key
stakeholders." You
can access the Executive Summary here.
|
|
Strongly agree
|
|
X
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
13.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. For example, this could
include extra content you think should be included in the Executive
Summary.
|
Yes the executive summary clearly
presents the draft strategy
|
|
14.
To
what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
"The Case For Action sets out the region’s key opportunities
sufficiently, including potential for further
devolution."
|
|
Strongly agree
|
|
X
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
15.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. For example, this could
include any content you think is missing from the Case For
Action.
|
The case for action outlines key
regional opportunities that retrofit can support. Comfort, cost
& climate effectively capture the vision of the draft strategy.
Further details that provide a clearer financial roadmap and
contingency planning would be welcomed. The strategy should aim to
explicitly protect and empower existing local delivery models,
especially those focused on residents.
The strategy rightly calls for
retrofit to be “bespoke to the region” and this is
important to ensure flexibility in funding, reporting and delivery
models to reflect the diversity of housing types and community
needs across the region. NY is a very rural region, with older
housing stock that is geographically dispersed. This can make it
challenging to retrofit at pace and scale and can contribute to
higher costs. These challenges are not present in an urban
environment and differences need to be accounted for in relation to
funding and delivery models.
Changes could be made in the
wording to the EPC section as the beginning paragraph under
‘Comfort’ reads clunky. Under ‘Cost’
– there is the potential to add in information on job
creation and investment in education and skills. In the
‘Climate’ section it may be more appropriate to remove
some examples of how much carbon is produced and to focus on
reductions associated with retrofit.
|
|
16.
Is
there any extra evidence or engagement you think should be added to
the development process, such as academic papers, findings from
local projects, or feedback from relevant engagement
sessions? YNYCA
is particularly interested in any further evidence related to the
energy efficiency of non-domestic buildings, community buildings
and the number of retrofit-focused businesses in the area. Please
note we may wish to follow-up with you about any further
evidence.
|
X
|
Yes - Please detail any feedback in
the space below
|
|
|
No - Please detail any feedback in
the space below
|
|
|
Not sure - Please detail any
feedback in the space below
|
Please detail any
feedback:
|
We strongly recommend that
the strategy includes a commitment to lobby central government for
dedicated funding schemes to support the retrofit of hard-to-treat
homes. Without this, there is a real risk that these properties
will be left behind, undermining both the equity and effectiveness
of the region’s decarbonisation efforts. A tailored approach
is essential to ensure that all residents—regardless of the
type of home they live in—can benefit from warmer, healthier,
and more energy-efficient housing. These properties are
disproportionately expensive and technically complex to retrofit.
For example, internal data shows that the average cost of
retrofitting a listed or conservation area dwelling can exceed
£42,000, with some cases reaching up to £150,000 per
home. Planning constraints, the need for specialist materials, and
the requirement for skilled heritage contractors all contribute to
these costs.
Furthermore, there needs to be more
nuance included in the boiler replacement paragraph because it is
not as simple as just installing a ASHP instead of a gas/oil
boiler. Remove the mention of geothermal because this is a heat
source for a heat network, not something to consider instead of a
heat network.
In this section there is little
reference to the role of universities particularly the University
of York which has specific expertise in this area.
|
17.
Do
you agree to York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority following
up with your organisation with regards to gathering further
evidence to support the Retrofit Strategy?
|
X
|
Yes, I agree
|
|
|
No, I do not agree
|
18.
To
what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
"The Strategic Framework clearly sets out the vision, strategic
priorities and outcomes of the Strategy, and their
relationships."

|
X
|
Strongly agree
|
|
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
19.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. For example, this could
include formatting changes.
|
Yes the strategic vision is clear
and the priorities are targeted effectively to meet the three
outcomes.
|
|
20.
To
what extent do you agree or disagree with the vision of the
Retrofit Strategy, that ‘York and North Yorkshire’s
Buildings are Fit for Now and For the Future For
All’?

|
X
|
Strongly agree
|
|
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
21.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. For example, this could
include themes you think are missing from the vision.
|
The vision effectively captures the
aim of regional retrofit.
|
|
22.
To
what extent do you agree with the following statement: "The six
strategic priorities of Demand, Skills and Supply Chain, Finance
Innovation, Programmes and Demonstrators, Data and Research, and
Stakeholder Collaboration are the right areas of
focus."

|
|
Strongly agree
|
|
X
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
23.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. For example, this could
include any detail you think is missing from the Strategic
Priorities.
|
The strategic priorities
effectively identify areas of retrofit that require
focus.
A key area that could be
strengthened is ‘Stakeholder Collaboration’ It does
highlight regional coordination but there is no explicit priority
for supporting and enabling local infrastructure. “"Unite
local organisations in their approach to retrofit and coordinate
strategic delivery" – a suggestion could be an enhancement to
uniting and empowering local authorities and delivery partners.
This section would also benefit by including a clearer focus on
ensuring inclusion and access to retrofit, particularly for
vulnerable residents, those in fuel poverty, and people living in
hard-to-treat homes.
|
|
24.
For
each of the action plans, to what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following statement: "The action plans cover what needs to
happen to increase the pace and scale of retrofit."
|
|
Strongly agree
|
Agree
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
Disagree
|
Strongly disagree
|
|
|
Demand
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Skills & Supply
Chain
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Innovation
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Data and Research
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Stakeholder
Collaboration
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Programmes and
Demonstrators
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
25.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. For example, this could
include any further detail you think should be included in the
action plans.
|
he action - Develop a York and North
Yorkshire Retrofit One Stop Shop” implies a decision has
already been made, which could undermine the need for proper
evaluation, governance, and local input. NYC supports a joined-up
approach for messaging and front-end engagement, but that any
decision on structure and funding must follow a fully costed
options appraisal and go through governance, the risks must be
clearly set out Loss of Local Control, Unproven Value,
Cost-Effectiveness and Governance - the ACTION itself should be
changed to something more generic e.g. Undertake an options
appraisal to explore models for delivering integrated retrofit
advice and support across York and North Yorkshire
Pilot financial policyoptions for
YNY - again the description for this action suggests a one stop
shop will be in place can we suggest a change to aligning it to our
chosen models for delivering integrated retrofit advice and support
across York and North Yorkshire
Devolved Retrofit Delivery
Programme - This action to devolve retrofit delivery is welcome,
but it is essential that this is accompanied by additional funding,
not simply a redistribution of existing resources. Spreading
current funding more thinly across a wider geography risks
undermining delivery capacity, slowing progress, and placing
further strain on already stretched local teams.
To meet the scale and pace of
retrofit required—particularly in rural and hard-to-treat
areas—devolution must come with new, dedicated investment.
This will ensure that local authorities can build on existing
delivery infrastructure, maintain momentum, and deliver meaningful
outcomes for residents.
In programmes and Demonstrators
– bullet point 4 is not a challenge.
|
|
26.
To
what extent do you agree with the following statement: "The three
outcomes of Comfort, Cost and Climate are appropriate for the
Retrofit Strategy."
|
|
Strongly agree
|
|
X
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
27.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. For example, this could
include any additional outcomes.
|
The strategy highlights that it is
supporting a just transition and that interventions should be
aligned with that. This is going to be very important in the
retrofit space to alleviate fuel poverty, and negative health
outcomes that the strategy addresses on p32. Hard to treat
properties cost significantly more to retrofit. It would be
welcomed if the draft Retrofit Strategy or YNYCA could lobby
central government into providing additional funding for these
properties that are typically in rural areas. This would help avoid
large areas of the region being left behind.
The outcome labelled
‘Cost’ should be changed to ‘Economy’ to
highlight the economic opportunity and reduce the emphasis on any
negative perception related to costs.
|
|
28.
To
what extent do you agree or disagree with the evaluation indicators
and metrics that have been set out?

|
|
Strongly agree
|
|
X
|
Agree
|
|
|
Neither agree nor
disagree
|
|
|
Disagree
|
|
|
Strongly disagree
|
29.
Please
provide some detail for your answer. For example, you may wish to
provide detail about any missing indicators.
|
How easy will energy consumption be
to measure? While the strategy rightly highlights the role of data,
it should also recognise the challenges of measuring energy use-
especially in non-council owned buildings where access to reliable
data is limited.
The reference to “incidents
of mould” would benefit from clarification. Mould is
influenced by a range of factors—ventilation, occupancy,
lifestyle, building condition—and is not always directly
attributable to energy efficiency or retrofit. If the intention is
to highlight health impacts, it may be more meaningful to reference
data on hospital admissions or GP referrals linked to damp and
mould. However, gathering consistent and localised data on this is
challenging. The strategy should ensure any indicators used are
measurable, evidence-based, and clearly linked to retrofit
outcomes.
Missing indicators: Could add the
number of apprentices employed by companies working on retrofit in
the supply chain.
|
|
30.
Do
you capture any of the following evaluation indicators at a local
level?
|
X
|
CO2 emissions (tons of
CO2/CO2e)
|
|
X
|
Energy consumption
(kWh/m2/year)
|
|
X
|
Renewable energy production
(kWh/year)
|
|
|
Fuel poverty (% of
households)
|
|
X
|
Type and number of retrofit
measures (# of retrofit measures)
|
|
|
% of buildings above EPC/DEC C
(EPC)
|
|
X
|
Incidents of mould (# of
incidents)
|
|
|
Number of excess deaths due to
extreme heat or cold (# of deaths)
|
|
|
Use of warm spaces (# of users or
hours used)
|
|
X
|
Investment in retrofit
(£)
|
|
X
|
Jobs in retrofit (# of full time
equivalent employees)
|
|
X
|
Growth of supply chain (# of
businesses in retrofit)
|
|
X
|
Financial savings from retrofit
(energy bills) (£)
|
|
X
|
Number of retrofit courses provided
(# of courses)
|
|
|
No my organisation doesn't capture
any of the above
|
31.
Do
you have any other comments on the Strategy?
|
NYC have played an active role in
supporting the development of the retrofit strategy and are
actively delivering retrofit project across the region.
|
|
32.
Over
the last 5 years has your organisation delivered any retrofit
activity? This can include retrofit works or supporting activities,
such as advice or training.
|
X
|
Yes
|
|
|
No - not yet
|
|
|
No - it's not my organisation's
responsibility
|
33.
In
the last 5 years how much retrofit activity has your organisation
delivered? This can include retrofit works or supporting
activities, such as advice or training.
|
|
Number/Metric
|
|
Number of buildings brought to EPC
C or DEC C
|
|
|
Number of learners upskilled in
retrofit qualifications
|
|
|
Number of people provided with
advice
|
|
|
Other - please provide further
detail in box below (including metrics in the box to the
right)
|
|
Other
|
NYC have provided advice on
retrofit but it is difficult to establish consistent figures over a
five-year period due to Local Government Reorganisation. Advice is
currently delivered through multiple channels – including
energy advisors and enforcement teams under MEES. The strategy
should recognise these limitations and support the development of
consistent, coordinated reporting mechanisms across all delivery
partners.
|
34.
Would
your organisation be interested in delivering further retrofit in
the future?
|
X
|
Yes - Please detail any feedback in
the space provided below.
|
|
|
No - Please detail any feedback in
the space provided below.
|
|
|
Not sure - Please detail any
feedback in the space provided below.
|
Please detail any
feedback:
|
NYC have dedicated retrofit teams
and have well established delivery models that are currently
delivering retrofit measures across the region.
|
35.
What
is currently the biggest blocker or blockers to your organisation
delivering more retrofit?
For
example, lack of funding, lack of capacity, lack of trained staff
etc.
|
Funding Gaps: Insufficient and short-term
funding limits planning and delivery, especially for complex or
hard-to-treat homes.
Workforce
Shortages:
Lack of trained retrofit professionals
Supply Chain
Constraints:
Limited local contractor capacity
Property
Complexity:
High numbers of pre-1919 and solid wall homes increase costs and
technical challenges.
Inconsistent messaging around
retrofit—particularly regarding the
cost and performance of technologies like air source heat pumps
(ASHPs)—is a growing barrier. Conflicting information fuels
public uncertainty and hesitancy, especially around running costs
and suitability. Clear, consistent, and trusted communication is
essential to build confidence and drive uptake.
|
|
36.
If
it is mentioned, is the role of your organisation in retrofit
accurately reflected in the Strategy?
|
X
|
Yes – please provide any
feedback in the space below
|
|
|
No – please provide any
feedback in the space below
|
|
|
My organisation is not mentioned in
the Strategy, but should be – please provide any feedback in
the space below
|
|
|
My organisation is not mentioned in
the Strategy, but does not need to be
|
Please provide any
further detail:
|
It is important that the retrofit
strategy explicitly recognises NYC as a key delivery partner. Given
the rurality, housing diversity, and operational challenges across
NYC’s geography, the strategy must commit to locally tailored
delivery models and funding formulas that reflect need—not
just population
|
37.
Which
strategic priorities do you feel your organisation is most able to
support? Please
select all that apply Demand - Grow York and North
Yorkshire’s market demand for retrofit at a pace and scale
aligned to regional and national retrofitting and net zero targets.
Skills and Supply Chain - Support the supply chain for retrofit to
cope with growing demand Finance Innovation - Reduce finance as a
barrier to retrofit, to ensure it does not hold back the rate of
change Data and Research - Ensure a data and research driven
approach to retrofit Stakeholder Collaboration – Unite local
organisations in their approach to retrofit and coordinate
strategic delivery Programmes and Demonstrators - Demonstrate best
practice and deliver programmes that meet the pace and scale of
retrofit required.
|
|
Demand – please provide any
feedback in the space below
|
|
|
Skills and Supply Chain –
please provide any feedback in the space below
|
|
|
Finance Innovation – please
provide any feedback in the space below
|
|
|
Data and Research – please
provide any feedback in the space below
|
|
|
Stakeholder collaboration –
please provide any feedback in the space below
|
|
|
Programmes and Demonstrators
– please provide any feedback in the space below
|
Please provide any feedback in the
space below:
|
Most Strongly Aligned Strategic
Priorities
Stakeholder
Collaboration
It will be key for NYC to be
involved in this as one of the large stakeholders, the frameworks
will also need to align with NYC governance, policies and
procedures. Conflicting approaches will put this action at
risk.
The creation of a pool of knowledge
and expertise would be beneficial. This might include
research institutions and other partners to develop a resource for
access new research and innovation. Maybe a biannual
conference of partners (cop) with a focus on reducing carbon
emissions in the built environment?
Programmes and
Demonstrators
NYC is actively delivering retrofit
programmes such as the Warm Homes Fund. We are also involved in the
CNCF retrofit energy and air quality as a joint project with CYC
and continue to take on new projects and schemes. Energy Advisors
embedded in our services for private sector homes.
Demand
Can support engagement campaigns
and marketing efforts to raise awareness of retrofit benefits among
homeowners, landlords, and vulnerable residents. This
priority needs more emphasis in the document. It should also
include a bit more detail on financing such as community financing
opportunities.
Finance Innovation
While not leading finance
innovation, we are happy to support and be involved in shaping
funding strategies and identifying gaps
Data and Research
We are already collaborating on
retrofit impact research. The opportunity to feed into and access a
shared platforms like the Retrofit Dashboard
Skills and Supply Chain
We can support local delivery and
contractor onboarding, direct involvement in supply chain
development via our retrofit programmes. The Council’s
Economic Development Service works to engage with businesses at a
local level and can help to identify skills needs going forwards
and supply chain opportunities for local businesses.
The Council (and the CA) could also
ensure local procurement of suppliers both in it’s own
procurement activity and that of partners
|
38.
Is
there any further feedback you wish to provide?
|
|
No
|
|
X
|
Yes - please detail any feedback
below
|
To ensure the Retrofit
Strategy delivers equitable outcomes and secures appropriate
funding for NYC, it is essential that the final strategy explicitly
recognises NYC’s role as a key delivery partner. Given the
rurality, housing diversity, and operational challenges across
NYC’s geography, the strategy must commit to locally tailored
delivery models and funding formulas that reflect need—not
just population
The Strategy should probably
reference new build and the need to ensure new houses are built
without the need for immediate retrofit interventions.
NYC are pleased that the strategy
includes the Climate Adaptation Study and highlights that these
outputs will be incorporated into the Retrofit Strategy.
|
|
39.
You
have now completed all of the questions related
to organisational views on the Strategy. If you would like to
answer the Strategy from the point of view of a resident, local
business and/or visitor to York and North Yorkshire, please
visit:
www.yorknorthyorks-ca.gov.uk/retrofit-strategy/