Decision details

*Re-published: call-in no longer applies* Review of Traffic Regulation Orders 2015(1) Objections – Area 6 Boroughbridge

Decision Maker: Corporate Director of Business and Environmental Services

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: No

Decision:

To support all the individual recommendations set out in the report ‘Review of Traffic Regulation Order 2015 (1) Objections – Area 6 Boroughbridge’ in response to the advertisement of two Traffic Regulation Orders promoted under The Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, titled;-

• North Yorkshire County Council (Harrogate, Knaresborough, Pannal and Burn Bridge) (Parking and Waiting) (No.20) Order 2015 - covering parking and waiting restriction proposals in the Harrogate and Knaresborough urban area.

• North Yorkshire County Council (Various Roads, Borough of Harrogate) (Parking and Waiting) (No.36) Order 2015 - covering proposals in Ripon, Boroughbridge and Killinghall.

In addition, a specific requirement was made by the Executive in regard to Item 1 of Appendix B of the aforementioned Report, Parliament Street, Harrogate (Taxi Rank proposal); officers are to review the operation of the taxi rank and report back to the Executive their findings in 12 months’ time.


Reasons for the decision:

*PLEASE NOTE This decision was originally published on or near the date of the decision and so call in no longer applies. It has been re-published as part of the change in committee management system that we use.*


To improve traffic movement, promote road safety, enhance the environment or address inconsistencies with existing parking arrangements. Most of the problems that the measures seek to address have been identified by persons who have experienced difficulties, local members, NYCC officers or by the North Yorkshire Police.

Alternative options considered:


Alternative arrangements were considered at all the individual sites, including not altering the current arrangements at some locations, however on balance the recommendations proposed appeared to best address the concerns raised.


Publication date: 11/05/2021

Date of decision: 05/06/2015