Agenda and minutes

Councillor Janet Jefferson

The minutes of the meeting held on 8 May 2025 were confirmed and signed as an accurate record.

All Members are invited to declare at this point any interests, including the nature of those interests, or lobbying in respect of any items appearing on this agenda.

Councillors Trumper, Sharma, Broadbent and Bastiman all declared that they had been lobbied by the architect and applicant in respect of planning application reference ZF24/01623/FL - Erection of 5 No. dwellings at 459A Scalby Road.

The Committee considered reports of the Head of Development Management – Community Development Services relating to applications for planning permission.  During the meeting, Officers referred to additional information and representations which had been received.

In considering the reports of the Head of Development Management – Community Development Services, regard had been paid to the policies of the relevant development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework and all other material planning considerations.

Where the Committee granted planning permission in accordance with the recommendation in a report this was because the proposal is in accordance with the development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework or other material planning considerations. Where the Committee refused planning permission the reasons for that decision are as shown in the report or as set out below.

Report of the Head of Development Management – Community Development Services

The Head of Development Management – Community Development Services sought determination of a planning application for erection of 5 No. dwellings at 459A Scalby Road, Scalby, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO12 6UA on behalf of Mr Andrew Winters.

Updating their report, the planning officer advised that the applicant had decided to withdraw the associated outline application for a residential development on the adjacent site to the rear of 459A Scalby Road (to have been considered as the next item on the agenda), but this did not impact on the decision making process nor the report for this application, save that officers were now proposing the following amended reasons for refusal as circulated at the meeting:

‘Local Plan Policy HC3: Affordable Housing and the subtext (6.48) makes it clear that planning permission should be refused for development that makes no or inadequate contribution to affordable housing where provision could reasonably be made; where the scale of development (in terms of site area and/or number of units is manipulated to fall below the threshold requiring provision of on-site affordable housing; and, that sub-division of a site and submission of individual planning applications will be challenged.

The wider development site, including adjoining land to the east which is in the same ownership as the application site, was initially sub-divided into two separate adjoining planning application sites which were been submitted simultaneously. In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, there is no clear and justified reason as to why the land has not been submitted as one entity. There are no technical reasons, including drainage, flood risk, ecology/biodiversity, or highways safety that indicates why the sub-division has occurred. Following publication of the recommendation of refusal for the application site and adjoining land, the associated outline application was withdrawn at a late stage in the decision-making process.

Consequently, the proposed scale of development falls under the threshold to provide affordable housing units (10+), however the Local Planning Authority deems that the application site should contribute to affordable housing provision taking into account the adjacent development site (Planning application Reference ZF24/01622/OL – up to 18 dwellings which was recently withdrawn). No affordable housing provision is proposed on this Full application site (5 dwellings), with the previous stated intention to provide the full 30% affordable housing provision on the Outline part of the site, despite this being described in the submission as being for speculative development that is likely to be sold as land with planning permission for housing. This would have imposed a significantly increased and disproportionate requirement on the area of the outline application site to provide affordable housing which may have made development of that site unviable and, therefore, threaten the delivery of both affordable and market housing. The density of the application site also falls significantly below the expected 30 dwellings per hectare, conflicting with Local Plan Policy DEC3 which states that proposals should make efficient use of land. The density of development should be in keeping with the character of the local  ...  view the full minutes text for item 124.

Report of the Head of Development Management – Community Development Services

Members were advised that the planning application had been withdrawn.

Report of the Head of Development Management – Community Development Services

The Head of Development Management – Community Development Services sought determination of a retrospective Listed Building Consent application to replace 5no. timber ladders with steel ladders at East Pier, Henrietta Street, Whitby, North Yorkshire, on behalf of North Yorkshire Council (Mr Andy Crossley).

During consideration of the application, the Committee discussed the following issues:

• Why the application by the council had been retrospective – this was attributed to lack of awareness that the East Pier was a listed structure and therefore that Listed Building Consent was required for such necessary alterations
• Public safety issues around the five ladders – they did not tend to be misused by the general public but instead performed an important function which included to enable crew to disembark from their boats in difficult conditions.

The decision:

That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the conditions detailed in the Committee report.

Voting record:

A vote was taken and the motion was declared carried unanimously.

Any other items which the Chair agrees should be considered as a matter of urgency because of special circumstances.

There were no urgent items of business.

Thursday, 10 July 2025 at 2.00pm

Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Town Hall, Scarborough