Minutes:
Considered
a presentation by Jo Ireland, Assistant Director Culture and Leisure which outlined
the key issues concerning the proposed replacement of the Community Football Pitch
at Scarborough Sports Village. Members
were reminded that extensive surveys undertaken earlier this year revealed
serious ground stability defects believed to be related to a defective drainage
system originally installed to the pitch, a void in the rough location of a buried
culvert, a blocked combination sewer and ground failure. Positive discussions were taking place with
the primary contractor responsible for the pitch, with a view to the defects
being remedied in a timely manner. The
pitch, owned by North Yorkshire Council and managed by Everyone Active, was a popular
community facility, used by various groups and teams, was the home ground of
Scarborough Athletic Football Club (SAFC) who played in the football league
(National league North) and was an integral part of the wider Scarborough
Sports Village facility.
The
recommended option to replace the pitch was a technical solution (partial
excavation and installation of geogrid) with full remediation of drainage
defects and then to resurface the pitch at the current location. This had been costed at circa £3.2m through a
programme of 44 weeks duration, although direct contract awards would reduce this
timeframe significantly. Ms Ireland then
outlined the impact of the poor condition of the pitch on SAFC who would have to
find an alternative venue (Bridlington Town) for the 2025/26 season, on other
users, on Everyone Active who would be eligible to be compensated by the
council for loss of income, and longer term because the replacement higher
quality pitch would mean some 50% less community use. The Executive would meet on 17 June 2025 to
consider recommendations to ensure continuity of community football and which
reflected the council’s aim to deliver a timely solution, to minimise the
income loss and reduce the impact on all users, including SAFC. Whilst the dialogue with contractors
continued and all appropriate legal remedies would be pursued, the recommendation
would be to adopt a backstop position if agreement could not be reached in a
timely manner for the council to undertake the work to remedy the defects and
resurface up to a potential cost of £3.2m.
In
reply to their questions and comments, members were further advised that:
· The
Playing Pitch Strategy was currently being refreshed and would uncover any local
deficit in 3G/grass pitches in respect of council’s aim to provide for and promote
community use
· The
delay in informing members about the pitch’s failure was regrettable, whilst recognising
the priority given to SAFC to brief their fans at the earliest opportunity
· The
council was in constant dialogue with SAFC who it was understood were
considering initiatives to assist their fans in travelling to Bridlington for
home games
· The
question of whether the council would compensate SAFC for their loss of income would
be for members to consider and determine at the appropriate time
· It
was difficult to estimate at this time when works would commence to construct
the new pitch, subject to Executive approval and agreement with the contractor,
although the aim remained to complete the works before the start of the 2026/27
season
Members commended the
swiftness of the council’s response to this issue, the strength and resilience
of SAFC and their fans, and placed on record the committee’s thanks to Bridlington
Town AFC for reaching a ground share agreement with SAFC.
Resolved that the presentation be received.
Supporting documents: