Issue - meetings

To consider the CIL proposals submitted by Ryedale District Council on 29 March

 

 

Meeting: 20/06/2023 - Executive (Item 261)

261 To consider the CIL proposals submitted by Ryedale District Council on 29 March pdf icon PDF 419 KB

Recommendations

The Executive is recommended to:

i.        Retain the totality of CIL funding transferred from Ryedale DC rather than approve the grants as proposed by Ryedale DC

ii.       Allocate the CIL funding of £3m to education capital schemes in the former Ryedale district

iii.      To work with local groups where possible to assist in other funding opportunities

iv.      Note the intention to progress an approach to CIL for the Council as part of the transitional arrangements with a report to be brought forward to the Executive for consideration at an appropriate time.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Considered – A report of the Corporate Director of Resources seeking consideration of the recommendations to award Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) funding to a number of community schemes as requested by Ryedale District Council on 28 March 2023.

 

Councillor Gareth Dadd introduced the report and provided a factual summary of where the Council was at as of June 2023.

 

He noted a number of public submissions had been received, as follows:

 

1. Mark McCandless - Chief Executive Officer, Ryedale Learning Trust

He firstly drew attention to an email received from Gary Fielding on 9 June 2023 at 17.13 which stated:

 

The report recommends that your request for grant funding is not supported. The recommendation in the report is that CIL is earmarked for school buildings works in the former Ryedale area. The report includes the following excerpt relating to your particular proposal.

 

We would expect other funding routes to be exhausted prior to any request for CIL including from DfE contribution as this is an academy. Strong sports related project, with community benefit which levered in substantial match funding and had the support of the Football Foundation. Positive scheme but lower priority than the proposed educational use.

 

He went on to state:

 

‘Thank you for the feedback provided on our application, which I will refer to. We absolutely understand the pressure on NYC in terms of funding and being able to demonstrate delivering value for tax payers’ money.

 

For clarity, we would like to highlight that the 3G project at Ryedale School has the highest amount of matched funding in place in terms of the schemes being considered today and requires the lowest intervention rate (16%). It has received the support of the Football Foundation, other grant awarding bodies and the general public living in the community as this facility is much needed in the Ryedale area. In terms of value for money, this council has the opportunity to help deliver a project (worth in the region of £1M) that is desperately needed in this part of North Yorkshire, for an investment of 16%, equating to £125k.  All funding routes were exhausted (and with significant success) prior to this request for CIL funding, including DfE contributions (the CIF process makes clear that this project will not qualify for funding, and currently this is the only route open to us to bid for DfE capital funding). The match funding already secured for this project will be put at significant jeopardy if we do not receive the investment requested from NYC, and therefore it is highly unlikely this project will go  ...  view the full minutes text for item 261