Subsidised Educational Transport - Discussion
Minutes:
As part of the Council’s Public Participation Scheme, Gordon
Stainsby, Headteacher of Reeth and Gunnerside Schools addressed the Committee to
read out his previously submitted statement and additional remarks which are
replicated below:
“As previously stated, we have concerns regarding the
application and impact of the new transport policy in our area. For many years,
pupils from our schools in Reeth and Gunnerside have attended Richmond School –
our catchment secondary school. This makes a lot of sense as the B6270 to
Richmond is our only low-level route to a nearby town. Swaledale is surrounded
by high altitude moorland. While some other secondary schools may well be
closer, these upland routes are 420m, 468m and 515m above sea level. The
digital tool that has been developed to identify the nearest school for each
pupil uses the shortest route by road, irrespective of the nature or type of
road, or its feasibility as a school transport route. For example, The
Wensleydale School in Leyburn is identified as the nearest school for pupils
living in Reeth. The calculation is based on travelling on a minor road through
Grinton, and over the moor. Larger vehicles are not
allowed by law to use the road, due to a weight restriction yet it has been used
to identify the nearest school. Due to pupil numbers a full-size bus is
required to transport pupils from Swaledale to Richmond School at the moment.
If some or all of these pupils attended the Wensleydale School a large vehicle
over the weight limit would be required, perhaps not in the first year but at
some point, as the policy impacts more and more school cohorts. The route from Reeth to Leyburn that is
suitable for a larger bus is actually further than the distance to Richmond
School. Clearly this does not make
sense. In upper Swaledale, the digital tool has identified Kirkby Stephen as
closest although the route there is 515m above sea level and dangerous in
winter. While the nearest school principle is easy to understand in most
contexts, its application in our region requires further consideration.
Another issue with the digital tool has emerged since
parents started using it. Two families living one mile apart and on a road that
would be used to travel to all the nearby schools have received a different
list of schools. For example, family one has received a Wensleydale school at
8.0320 miles, Richmond School at 9.892 miles and a third school at 10.139
miles. Family 2 also received
Wensleydale school as the closest one at 7.032 miles but the second school listed
is the Risedale School at 9.633 miles and then the
Richmond School at 9.716 miles – clearly there is a discrepancy between those
lists despite the fact that the families live on the same road and the bus
would have travelled past both houses.
The DoE statutory guidance tells us that councils have a duty to undertake risk assessments. I understand that the Council has not ... view the full minutes text for item 107