Venue: City of York Council - George Hudson Room, West Offices
Contact: Elizabeth Jackson, Democratic Services Manager email: elizabeth.jackson@northyorks.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Welcome by the Chair, introductions and apologies for absence Minutes: The Chair, Councillor Claire Douglas, welcomed everyone to
the meeting. There was an apology for absence from Zoe Metcalfe, the
Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner. Members were advised that the meeting would be recorded and
broadcast and available to view on the City of York Council website. The link to the recording of
the meeting is here Joint
Devolution Committee, 15 December 2023 (youtube.com) |
|
|
Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee held on 23 October 2023 Minutes: |
|
|
Declarations of Interest To note any declarations of interest Minutes: Helen Simpson advised that she was Chair of
Broadacres Housing Association and would leave the room for consideration of
the Brownfield Housing Fund programme at Minute 26. |
|
|
Questions and Statements by the Public Members of the public may ask questions or make statements at this meeting under Council Procedure Rule 9 if they have given notice and provided the text to Daniel Harry of Democratic Services (daniel.harry@northyorks.gov.uk) no later than 12 noon on Tuesday 12 December 2023. Each speaker should limit themselves to 3 minutes on any item. Members of the public who have given notice will be invited to speak: · at this point in the meeting if their questions/statements relate to matters which are not otherwise on the Agenda (subject to an overall time limit of 30 minutes); or · when the relevant Agenda item is being considered if they wish to speak on a matter which is on the Agenda for this meeting. Minutes: Public statement made under North Yorkshire
Council Procedure Rule 9 by Gwen Swinburn Thank you chair. We were sold the Mayoral
Combined Authority on the basis it brings decision making closer to the people
yet in every regard so far the opposite is true. Forget the people, even our
councillors under both administrations have been almost entirely left out. This
is a plea to do better. Despite repeated requests, no underpinning
documents including but not limited to the Constitution were presented to the
York Scrutiny or Audit committees. A short governance paper to our Corporate
Scrutiny Committee this week made it clear there was to be no member
involvement in considering even the draft Constitution. Our members railed
against this and were given a 250 page draft Constitution one working day
before their meeting. Suffice it to say the members of all parties were incensed
that they had been excluded from being consulted on this key document. They
agreed to not comment substantively until a further revised draft was presented
to special meetings to both Corporate Scrutiny and Audit and Governance in
early January, it's all on the webcast. I raise this here because it needs to be on
public record that it is councillors whom we elect to represent us not
officers. They should not be excluded as they have been. We need to mould the
best governance practice of each York, North Yorkshire and the Manchester model
and make sure that the worst practice is not adopted, for example whilst in
many I might say most regards but not all, the governance arrangements at face
at North Yorkshire Council are far more robust than ours. Their public participation and webcasting
protocols are really however quite chilling compared with York’s. Thanks for the dispensation to speak freely
today. I understand your emphasis for the moment is likely to be on finance and
political representation which appears to be quite different from the deal our
Members at least thought they signed up for and also who will chair the
authority January to May, but we must not forget the essential foundations of
governance. Finally, I have to thank Suzanne Harrington for her refreshing
frankness on this matter and recognize all parties including me have been
guilty of not pushing staff hard enough to provide a proper governance timeline
and transparency so we could all properly engage. Thank you Chair. Councillor Claire Douglas advised that the
draft Constitution had been discussed on Monday at the City of York Scrutiny
Committee, prior to this meeting, and a commitment had been made to bring it
back to both York Scrutiny Committees.
Councillor Carl Les confirmed that the Constitution had also been
considered by a Scrutiny Committee at North Yorkshire Council and no issues had
been raised. |
|
|
Additional documents: Minutes: A joint report by Debbie Mitchell, Chief
Finance Officer, City of York Council and Nick Edwards, North Yorkshire Council,
which provided an update on the financial aspects of the Combined Authority
(CA). Debbie Mitchell introduced the report and
gave an overview of the key points. ·
A sum of up to £1m from the Mayoral Investment Fund
was requested to work up a pipeline of investible schemes. ·
As part of the devolution deal the Government had
allocated £347k funding to the CA to develop a pipeline of housing projects and
to work with strategic housing partners.
As the CA had not yet been created confirmation was requested for North
Yorkshire Council to be confirmed as the accountable body for receipt of these
funds. ·
An update was provided on the approved
implementation costs of £1.6m incurred to date based on an implementation date
of November. As implementation was now
expected in January, an additional 3 months of costs was now anticipated. All costs would be recovered in full once the
CA was created.
The voting members
of the committee indicated their unanimous support for the recommendations in
the report. Resolved
– (2) £1m from £9m Mayoral Investment
Funding received on creation of the Combined Authority be approved to begin the
work on developing a pipeline of schemes as outlined in paragraphs 3.2 to 3.3
and that delegated approval be given to the Interim Director of Transition and
Interim S73 Officer to approve allocations to specific projects and to monitor
outcomes; (3) it be confirmed that North
Yorkshire Council are the accountable body for receipt of £347k of capacity
funding as outlined in paragraphs 3.4 to 3.6; and (4) the implementation and programme costs be noted and approval be given to increase the budget by £250k. |
|
|
Shortlisting of Brownfield Housing Fund Programme Full Business Cases Report of the Director of Transition, York
and North Yorkshire LEP Additional documents:
Minutes: A report by James
Farrar, Interim Director of Transition, York and North Yorkshire Local
Enterprise Partnership, regarding the allocation of an initial £9,681,071 of
funding to a programme of brownfield housing projects that would help to remove
the barriers to the building of new homes across York and North Yorkshire. Agreement was also sought for reopening the
call for further brownfield housing projects to enable the Brownfield Housing
Fund to be fully utilised and delivered by 31 March 2025. James Farrar
introduced the report and gave an overview of the key points, as summarised
below: · The word “Shortlisting” should be removed from the title of the paper · £12.7m of funding has been awarded over 2023/24 and 2024/25 to support
the building of new homes on brownfield land, to be delivered by March 2025;
the Committee were asked to approve £9.68m now · 700 new homes would be delivered, of which 250 were affordable · Approval was also sought for £504k for independent legal and project
management costs, 4% of the fund · A new call for projects had been proposed for the outstanding £3m. Since the report was written the Government
had confirmed that it would be possible to carry a third of the funding to
2025/26 due to the delays with creating the CA and therefore it was proposed to
put on hold re-opening the call for projects and bring back a revised timeline
reflecting the new deadline. City of York
Councillor Paula Widdowson attended the meeting and asked a question on behalf
of residents and councillors in relation to the Lowfield site. Councillor Widdowson asked if the funding
would be sufficient to deliver the three undeveloped plots on the site, which
had been stalled for a couple of years.
James Farrar advised that all the business cases had been independently
appraised and the recommendation was that the site was deliverable. Bryn Roberts advised that the funding would
be devolved to CYC, which would be responsible for delivering the project,
rather than the CA. The voting members
of the committee indicated their unanimous support for the recommendations in
the report. Resolved
– That (1) £9,681,071 in principle be allocated
(noting that £504,071 is towards programme management costs), subject to the
following conditions being met: 1. Establishment of the MCA, 2. Further due diligence and contractual agreements with project applicants; (2)
the Director of Transition be given delegated responsibility to provide final
sign-off on the proposed investment (once the above conditions have been met);
and the ability to approve any minor adjustments to grant funding amounts to
projects; and (3) the Director of Resource for the MCA be given delegated responsibility to accept the Brownfield Housing Fund allocation from DLUHC. |
|
|
Economic Framework for the York and North Yorkshire MCA Report of the Director of Transition, York
and North Yorkshire LEP Minutes: A report by James
Farrar, Interim Director of Transition, York and North Yorkshire Local
Enterprise Partnership, which set out a draft Economic Framework for the York
and North Yorkshire Combined Authority. James Farrar
introduced the report and gave an overview of the key points, as summarised
below: · The Economic Framework had been created to reflect a shared strategic
ambition and shared priorities of the City of York and North Yorkshire
Councils; the process had been to start with CYC and NYC economic frameworks,
both of which had been widely consulted on. · The framework was underpinned by three overriding ambitions: the
transition to a carbon negative region; to deliver good economic growth; and to
increase opportunities for all; and also reflected that health and well-being
should be reflected through all priorities.
The framework then set out eight priority themes under which investment
plans would be developed, as set out in Section 4 of the report. · Following approval of the draft Framework consultation would take place,
including with the Scrutiny Committees of CYC and NYC and the LEP Board, with a
final framework to be agreed by the CA in February 2024. The Mayor would then have the opportunity to
review the Framework once elected. Councillor Claire Douglas noted that the
document would be live and under ongoing review until after the Mayor was
elected. The voting members of the committee indicated
their unanimous support for the recommendations in the report. Resolved – That the draft Economic Framework be approved
to enable further consultation with City of York and North Yorkshire Councils,
and wider stakeholders. |
|
|
Combined Authority Governance: Development of the Constitution for the Combined Authority Report of the Director of Transition, York
and North Yorkshire LEP Additional documents:
Minutes: Considered – A report by Barry
Khan, Assistant Chief Executive
(Legal and Democratic Services), North Yorkshire Council, in relation to the
preparation of the Constitution of the Combined Authority. Attached at Appendix A was a table which
summarised the main parts of the Order and how decisions would be made and a
copy of the draft Constitution was attached at Appendix B to the report. Barry Khan introduced the report and gave an
overview of the key points, as summarised below: ·
Officers from CYC, NYC
and the OPFCC had worked together to produce the draft Constitution. ·
The Order to create the
CA had been debated in the House of Commons and the House of Lords and was
expected to be approved before the end of the year. The draft Constitution would need to be
approved at the first meeting of the CA which was expected to be on 22 January
2024. Further reports will be brought to
the CA in respect of amendments to enable additional parts to be incorporated
in relation to PFCC functions which would transfer into the CA on 7 May
following the Mayoral election on 2 May. ·
A single
multi-disciplined Overview and Scrutiny Committee was proposed to look at the
whole range of areas covered by the CA.
An Audit and Governance Committee consisting of four Members from each
of the constituent authorities and an Independent Person was proposed. There would also be a Business Committee
consisting of potentially five Members and ten private sector members, and the
Assurance Framework at Minute 29 gave more detail on how the LEP Board would be
incorporated into the Business Committee.
The CA might also choose to have a Transport Committee and the PFCC
functions would also need to be included, mirroring existing arrangements. Suzan Harrington advised that the
Constitution would be a work in progress for some time as the CA was a new
organisation. It was hoped that a final
version could be published in early January to give Members opportunity to look
at it and raise any concerns. Councillor Paula Widdowson addressed the
Committee and advised of concerns that in relation to Scrutiny the scheme CYC
signed up to was proportional on each of the constituent authorities, however
the Order was silent on this and the Constitution stated that it was both
authorities added together, which was not what CYC had agreed to. CYC also agreed to a Mayor that wasn’t first
past the post. Councillor Widdowson
requested clarity on why what they were getting was not what they had voted
on. Suzan Harrington responded that
there was a Statutory Instrument from 2017 which set out the legal requirements
for scrutiny at combined authorities and
paragraph 4 made it clear that for
scrutiny committees at combined authorities the political proportionality
applied to the area as a whole and not individual council areas. Councillor Claire Douglas requested that the matters raised in relation to political balance on the Scrutiny Committee be addressed promptly in advance of the ... view the full minutes text for item 28. |
|
|
Combined Authority Local Assurance Framework Report of the Director of Transition, York
and North Yorkshire LEP Additional documents: Minutes: Considered – A report in the name of the Interim Director of Transition, York and
North Yorkshire Local Enterprise Partnership, which sought approval of a draft
Local Assurance Framework for the York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority,
which was attached at Appendix B to the report. James Farrar introduced the report and
advised that the Local Assurance Frameworks were a requirement under the
Devolution Accountability Framework and set out how the CA would use public
money responsibly, make robust and lawful decisions and make sure that value
for money was achieved. Paul Clark, Governance and Assurance Manager,
gave an overview of the key points, as summarised below: ·
Whilst this was an
iterative document which would change over time, it was required to have a document
in place on Day 1 sufficient to pull down the first tranche of funding from the
Government and to enable the CA to function when staff transferred in. ·
The document was
structured around the Green Book principles on appraising projects to
demonstrate value for money and set out internal decision-making processes to
reach a point of decision. ·
The document had been
drafted in consultation with officers from CYC, NYC, the OPFCC and the Local
Enterprise Partnership. ·
A draft version was
required to be provided to DLUHC by 30 November for their internal review
processes, and the version before Members included proposed governance
arrangements as set out in the Order. It
was expected that once officers heard back from the Government further work
would be required and delegated authority was being requested for the Director
of Transition to make any changes required by Government to bring the document
to the required standard to enable funding to be released. Resolved – That (1)
the draft Combined Authority Local Assurance Framework be approved; and (2)
authority be delegated to the interim Director of Transition, in consultation
with committee Co-Chairs, to make any material changes which may be necessary
for the agreement of a final draft with Government. |
|
|
Devolution Update The Director of Transition to report verbally Minutes: Considered – A verbal update by James Farrar, Interim Director of Transition, York
and North Yorkshire Local Enterprise Partnership, on work in relation to the
creation of a Combined Authority. · The Order had been
debated by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, where it had
passed with relative ease. Now both
houses would confirm in writing to the Minister that the debate had happened,
which would enable the Minister to sign the Order and the Combined Authority
would then be created the following day. ·
In the Autumn Statement the Government
had announced the Level 4 Devolution Framework and work was needed to
understand what the opportunities might be and once the Mayor was elected a
decision could be taken on whether to progress with this. Councillor Claire
Douglas reported feedback from the CYC Scrutiny Committee to the Joint
Devolution Committee. Matters in
relation to the political balance of Scrutiny Committee had been mentioned
earlier in the meeting. The Committee
felt it would be good to co-ordinate when information was shared with Members
across the two constituent authorities so that information went out as early as
possible, at the same time and that adequate time was allowed for consideration
of information going to Scrutiny Committees. Councillors Claire
Douglas and Carl Les thanked James and all the officers for their continuing
work on this against a challenging timeline. |
|
|
Committee Work Programme The Assistant Chief Executive (Legal and Democratic Services) to submit a written report Additional documents: Minutes: Considered - A report by Barry Khan, Assistant Chief Executive (Legal and Democratic
Services), North Yorkshire Council, outlining the proposed work programme for
the Committee, which would transform into the Combined Authority in January,
which was attached at Appendix A for Members to note. It was noted that this was the final meeting
of the Joint Devolution Committee. In response to a question from Councillor Gareth Dadd, James Farrar
confirmed that the Strategic Local Transport Plan scheduled for consideration
in March or April was a draft version, as required under the terms of the
devolution deal, and would be ready to be reviewed by the Mayor once elected. |
|
|
Any other items which the Chair agrees should be considered as a matter of urgency because of special circumstances Minutes: |