Venue: Scarborough Town Hall, St Nicholas Street, Scarborough, North Yorkshire YO11 2HG
Contact: St John Harris (tel: 01723 383556 email: stjohn.harris@northyorks.gov.uk) James Mowbray (tel: 01723 232307 email: james.mowbray@northyorks.gov.uk)
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies noted (see above). |
|
|
Minutes for the Meeting held on Thursday 13/07/2023 To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 13 July 2023 as an accurate record. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting
held on Thursday 13 July 2023 were confirmed and signed as an accurate record. |
|
|
Declarations of Interests All Members are invited to declare at this point any interests, including the nature of those interests, or lobbying in respect of any items appearing on this agenda. Minutes: There were no declarations of
interest. |
|
|
Planning Applications The Committee considered reports of the Assistant Director Planning –
Community Development Services relating to applications for planning
permission. During the meeting, Officers
referred to additional information and representations which had been received. Except where an alternative condition was contained in the report or an
amendment made by the Committee, the conditions as set out in the report and
the appropriate time limit conditions were to be attached in accordance with
the relevant provisions of Section 91 and 92 of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990. In considering the report(s) of the Assistant Director Planning –
Community Development Services, regard had been paid to the policies of the
relevant development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework and all other
material planning considerations. Where
the Committee deferred consideration or refused planning permission the reasons
for that decision are as shown in the report or as set out below. Where the Committee granted planning permission in accordance with the
recommendation in a report this was because the proposal is in accordance with
the development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework or other material
considerations as set out in the report unless otherwise specified below. Where the Committee granted planning
permission contrary to the recommendation in the report the reasons for doing
so and the conditions to be attached are set out below. |
|
|
Minutes: The Assistant
Director Planning – Community Development Services sought the determination of
a planning application for the demolition of a rear stone wall and the erection
of a replacement wall in a new position and the reconfiguration of a parking
area to introduce four electric vehicle charging points at 1-4 Farm Close,
Gristhorpe on behalf of Shaun Wood. Concluding
his presentation the Planning Officer stressed that the condition on the
original planning permission requiring that the original wall be repaired and
retained was something that Members had sought, rather than being something
that was recommended in advance by officers. Sean McGrath,
spoke on behalf of the applicant, in support of the application, Roberta
Swiers, division councillor, spoke in support of the application. During consideration of the
above application, the Committee discussed the following issues:- ·
The speed with which the wall had
deteriorated in recent years and the lack of care taken in ensuring the
maintenance of the wall. ·
The integrity of the Gristhorpe
conservation area and the walls position within it. The Decision:- That
the officer recommendation to refuse planning permission NOT BE SUPPORTED. Voting Record: A vote was taken and
the motion was declared carried with four for and two against. Reason:- The Committee’s reasons for
refusing the officer’s recommendation are set out below:- (i)
Members did not feel that the
application would be detrimental to the conservation area, or the ecology of
the area, taking into account that this is a new build development. Following the rejection of the
officer’s recommendation the Committee again considered the application
discussing the following issues:- ·
The need to landscape the front area
of the four cottages. ·
The need to provide some soft
landscaping to the rear wall, as originally intended. As Members had rejected the
recommendation the officer went on to suggest potential conditions covering the
follow:- ·
Samples of the stone. ·
A stone panel showing how the stone
is to be put together, including details relating to pointing. ·
Details of the gates. ·
Anything that remains relevant from
original approval. ·
An overall landscaping scheme for the
new layout. ·
Surfacing details, regarding the new
parking spaces and also the new footpaths. Members went on to add to the
above: ·
Markers identifying the line of the
original boundary wall. ·
Use of a traditional lime mortar to
point the wall. ·
That officers be granted delegated
authority to impose the conditions suggested previously by the officer and
those requested by the Committee. Decision:- That contrary to officer
recommendation planning permission be granted. Voting Record:- A vote was
taken and the motion was declared carried unanimously. Reason:- Members felt that the application
would not be detrimental to the conservation area, or the ecology of the area, taking
into account that this is a new build development. |
|
|
Minutes: The Assistant
Director Planning – Community Development Services sought the determination of
a planning application for the construction of one dormer window to each rear
elevation at 1-4 Farm Close, Gristhorpe on behalf of Shaun Wood. Updating the report
the officer confirmed to Members that the Highways Authority had indicated that
they had no objections to the proposal. Adding to his comments the officer
sought delegated authority to add a further reason for refusal – that being the
harm caused to the character and appearance of the buildings and also this part
of the Gristhorpe conservation area as a result of large areas of glazing on
the pantiles of the single story element. The officer went on to refer to
paragraph 3.5(a) of the report and highlighted the refusal of a previous scheme
for roof lights in the main roof of the building that would have detracted from
the buildings aesthetic in a similar way to the glazing being proposed now. Sean McGrath,
spoke on behalf of the applicant, in support of the application, Roberta Swiers, division councillor, spoke in support of the
application. Following the
public speaking segment the officer took the unusual step of directly
responding to some of the comments made by the agent. ·
Reminded the
Committee of their legal duty to ensure the preservation of, and enhance, the
conservation area. ·
That the
recommendation of refusal wasn’t necessarily an objection in principle to
dormer windows in the roofspace in question. Adding
that dormer windows are to an extent characteristic of Gristhorpe but that in
those instances were traditional and far smaller than those being proposed in
this instance. During consideration of the
above application, the Committee discussed the following issues:- ·
The size of the proposed windows. The Decision:- That permission be refused for
the reasons cited in the report as well as the additional reason for refusal
outlined by the officer in his opening remarks. Voting Record:- A vote was taken and the motion was declared carried with
four for and three against. Reason:- For the
reasons outlined in the report and as amended by the officers at the meeting. |
|
|
Any other items Any
other items which the Chair agrees should be considered as a matter of urgency
because of special circumstances. Minutes: There were no urgent items of
business. |
|
|
Date of Next Meeting 14.00 Thursday 14 September, Scarborough Town Hall. Minutes: 10.00 Thursday 14 September 2023
Scarborough Town Hall. |