Venue: Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Stone Cross, Northallerton, North Yorkshire DL6 2UU
Contact: Louise Hancock, Democratic Services Officer Tel: 01609 767015 Email: louise.hancock@northyorks.gov.uk
Note: This meeting is being held as an in-person meeting that is being broadcasted and recorded and will be available to view via the link below. Please contact the named democratic services officer supporting this committee if you would like to find out more.
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Election of Chair To elect a Member to act as Chair of the meeting Minutes: The decision: That Councillor Tim Grogan be elected as Chair for the duration of the meeting. (Councillor Grogan in the Chair) |
|
|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: There were no apologies for absence. |
|
|
Disclosures of Interest Councillors are invited to declare at this point any disclosable pecuniary interests they have in items appearing on this agenda, including the nature of those interests. Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
|
Procedure for Meeting To confirm the procedure to be followed at the meeting. Minutes: The decision: The Sub Committee agreed the procedure for the meeting as outlined by the Chair. |
|
|
HC217B – Application for renewal of Hackney Carriage Vehicle Licence To receive a report from the Corporate Director of Environment Minutes: The subject of the
decision: The Corporate
Director of Environment asked the Sub-Committee to consider whether to grant or
refuse an application for the renewal of a hackney carriage vehicle licence. Alternative
options considered: The Sub-Committee considered
refusing the application but concluded that the specific circumstances of the
case were sufficient to justify a departure from the Council’s Hackney Carriage
and Private Hire Licensing Policy. The reason for the
decision: The Sub-Committee
considered the Corporate Director’s report, the applicant’s written and oral
representations, the Council’s Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Licensing
Policy and the relevant legislation. The Sub-Committee
noted that the vehicle satisfied the standards relating to mechanical fitness
as set out in the Council’s Policy. However, the matter was referred to the
sub-Committee to consider allowing an exception to the general 10-year age
limit on licensed vehicles. The applicant
invited the Sub-Committee to consider the exceptional circumstances of his case
on the basis of the vehicle’s quality, appearance and condition. The Sub-Committee
conducted a visual inspection of the vehicle and was satisfied that the vehicle
appeared to be in good condition that was considered exceptional for its age. The Sub-Committee
considered the vehicle’s MOT and inspection history and was satisfied that the
mechanical condition of the vehicle was well maintained. The Sub-Committee
noted that the mileage on the vehicle was recently recorded as 224,054. The Sub-Committee
was satisfied that the Council’s policy generally opposes the renewal of a
licence in respect of vehicles over the age of ten years. The Sub-Committee
noted that the policy is expected to be applied in most cases, but it must not
automatically determine the outcome of the application, which must be
considered on its individual merits. The Sub-Committee
was satisfied that the age limit was adopted to promote public safety, to
increase reliability and to improve the standard of hackney carriage and
private hire services in North Yorkshire. The Sub-Committee acknowledged that
it was entitled to exercise its discretion to allow exceptions where the
applicant had demonstrated that the policy objectives could still be met. Ultimately the
Sub-Committee was asked to consider whether or not to renew the licence in
respect of a vehicle that exceeded the general age limits set by the Council’s
policy. The Sub-Committee
was satisfied that the mechanical condition of the vehicle, the high standard
of the vehicle’s condition and its appearance would adequately promote the
Council’s policy objectives in relation to standards, reliability and safety of
licensed vehicles. The Sub-Committee therefore concluded that the circumstances
of the applicant’s case justified a departure from the Council’s policy. The decision: Taking account of the above and having given appropriate weight to the evidence, the Sub-Committee was satisfied that the application could be granted without undermining the policy objectives. Therefore, the Sub-Committee decided to grant the application. |