Recommendations:
That
the Executive:
i. Agree that statutory proposals and notices
be published on 30 March 2023 proposing to cease to maintain Skelton Newby Hall
CE Primary School with effect from 31 August 2023; and proposing that the
catchment area of Kirby Hill CE VC be expanded with effect from 1 September
2023 to serve the area currently served by Skelton Newby Hall CE VC School.
ii. Schedule
taking a final decision on these proposals on 30 May 2023.
Minutes:
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director – Children and Young People’s
Service,
detailing the outcome of the public
consultation on a proposal to close Skelton Newby Hall CE VC Primary School,
and asking the Executive is asked to consider the responses to the
consultation, to authorise the publication of statutory proposals, and to
schedule taking a final decision on the proposal on 30 May 2023.
County Councillor Annabel
Wilkinson introduced the report and provided an overview of the background to
the proposal to close the school. She
also drew attention to the public consultation that had taken place and the responses received, as
detailed in Appendix 5 of the report, and the proposal to extend the catchment area of Kirby Hill CE VC
Primary to serve the area currently served by Skelton Newby Hall Primary.
The
Chairman invited Mr Guy Critchlow, Chairman of Skelton cum Newby Parish
Council, to read out his public submission as follows:
‘Chair,
Councillors, and Officers of the Council, thank you for the opportunity to
share a statement from the community of Skelton on Ure.
Three
minutes to put the case for Skelton Newby Hall Primary School. We are not
wearing rose tinted spectacles when making the case for our school to remain
open. Our school is viable and valuable to the village and surrounding areas.
As
you will be aware and as a start point, the government, “expects all decision
makers to adopt a presumption against the closure of rural schools. This does
not mean that a rural school will never close, but that the case for closure
should be strong and clearly in the best interests of educational provision in
the area.”
The
report has put the case that that the basis of closure is two reasons, the
falling roll and maintaining the quality & breadth of education for all
year groups. Indeed there is now only one pupil on the roll. This is not the natural
state of affairs for this school. This is not organically driven. Our school is
in this position as a result of a failed federation with Sharow School.
In
2021, Ofsted has recorded that Sharow School has issues of staff absenteeism,
unaddressed bullying concerns, and governance with a special Chair appointed
last September. It’s short inspection noted it would have been downgraded had
it been a full inspection, which we understand has just taken place.
Our
school has not been marketed appropriately to attract new pupils, which was
incorrectly recorded in the minutes of the public meeting. The report notes no
new housing developments in our current catchment. This lies at the heart of
the matter. Our catchment does not currently include the 800 houses in
development within five miles of our school which do not even know we exist.
Parents
of potential pupils were left underwhelmed when they enquired about spaces;
during the course of the last decade, and especially the last few years, the
reputation of the federation has led parents in the village to reluctantly
select other schools and even move their children due to concerns.
We
can correct this course and address the first concern around pupil roll.
We
have a Sustainable Future Plan for the school. There is shortage of nursery and
early years places in the area. We welcome the fact the government has just
opened up early years funding from age one which will further increase the
demand.
Our
School is the perfect 1.5 acre setting, a ready-made forest school, a large
amenity space with fully fitted playground, and even a safe drop off car park
which is perfect for early years. With the right leadership, the right
marketing, this school can thrive again. Whilst we approached the Leeds Diocesan
Learning Trust about working with Roecliffe, the mis-match of funding model has
not enabled us to progress at this point, even though there is a need. By
focusing on the provision of nursery and early years, we can address the second
concern around quality of education.
We
could pass comment on the format of the consultation, the bias in report layout
towards closure, the community feeling that this was a consultation in
name-only; in our opinion it certainly does not meet the spirit of the
government guidance on consultations.
However,
we want to focus on the opportunity which is our Sustainable Future Plan for
our school. We are a canary in the mine for the very essence of rural
communities in North Yorkshire and for the new North Yorkshire Council. We deserve
the opportunity to re-build our school and demonstrate it’s viability. We
cannot do this alone, we want to work with, not against, the Council in this
aim.’
In response, Annabel
Wilkinson Executive Member for Education, Learning & Skills noted that the Governors believed they had
been active in their collective efforts to raise numbers at the school, as
detailed in the report. Their initiatives had included the introduction of
nursery provision in September 2019, which attracted some children to the
school, although numbers were limited. Marketing of the school had included the
distribution of flyers to new houses in the area, and investment in the
school’s website.
She confirmed:
·
There had
been no responses to the consultation from other local schools offering
federation or alternative arrangements to allow Skelton Newby Hall School to
remain open.
·
Changing
the size of the Skelton Newby Hall catchment would not make any material
difference to the number of pupils attending Skelton Newby Hall School.
·
Parents
from inside or outside the Skelton Newby Hall catchment could apply at any time
for places at the school for their children.
She also
acknowledged the value of the Skelton Newby Hall CE VC site and its outdoor
learning area. The benefits of the site alone had not been sufficient though,
to attract parents to bring their children to the school. The school building
and site was not owned by the County Council, and the owners would decide about
the future use of the school site and building after the closure proposal had
been determined.
Finally she
confirmed that officers were confident that a full and detailed consultation
had been carried out to date, and that no final decision had been made at this
stage regarding the school’s future. She
suggested that if the Executive decided to proceed with the process by
approving the publication of statutory proposals, this would give another four
weeks for representations to be made by the public.
As the Councillor
for the village of Skelton on Ure, County Councillor Nick Brown was also
given the opportunity to speak on the proposed
closure of Skelton Newby Hall CE Voluntary Controlled Primary School, as
follows:
‘The school that
has been part of the community since 1856.
I understand that neither the Federation school in Sharow, that this
school merged with and is, I am told, not perfect with its own problems, nor
NYCC, discussed the matter with the Skelton community or its Parish Council in
the build up to the decision to consult on the proposed closure whilst parents
were being advised from the beginning of the September 2022 school year to find
places for their children at new schools for the September 2023 school year,
thus driving out pupils from the school ! Parents and Newby Estate, who own the
school land, heard about all this last November!
Trying to be
constructive I would like to think that, in future, whenever any school in
North Yorkshire is in danger of closure ,
because of a pattern of warning
signs from falling school numbers , then this information should be shared with
both NYC Councillors and Parish/Town Councils , much earlier, so they can help
with any other ideas that would prevent closure.
There appears to
be little evidence of marketing the school
to residents in the village of Skelton or to other residents in the new 800
house developments within 5 miles or so
of the school.
Can I suggest
that perhaps we should think beyond the box here and have a short delay to the
decision under review in order to look at having or supporting
In the light of
the recent budget and the proposed increase in child care provision, to enable
more much needed employment opportunities, surely a 1.5 acre school site would
lend itself perfectly for nursery provision in a lovely, rural and safe
environment set in a great rural setting which, properly marketed, would, I
believe be very popular with local residents who will see its benefits.’
Finally, County
Councillor Nick Brown queried what the position was regarding merging the
school’s catchment area with Kirby Hill, and expressed serious concern that it
would move Skelton Village out of the current Ripon Grammar School catchment
area.
In response, Annabel Wilkinson Executive Member for Education, Learning & Skills confirmed that
·
Parents/carers and the
Skelton Newby Hall Estate had been notified on 22 November 2022 that governors,
had with regret, asked the County Council to consult on closure proposals for
Skelton Newby Hall CE Primary School.
·
The Parish Council, like
other consultees, had been sent a copy of the consultation document at the
start of the consultation process, and that officers were confident that a full
and detailed consultation had been carried out.
·
Leaders
and Governors continued to maximise the range of shared experiences through the
Federation. Support had been provided by the LA School Improvement Team, and
since the start of the Autumn term, governors and leaders had accessed support
from an experienced National Leader in Governance.
·
The
federated governing body had worked very hard to recruit governors. In a
federation, governors represent all schools within a federation rather than
individual communities.
·
No
responses to the consultation had been received from other local schools
offering federation or alternative arrangements to allow Skelton Newby Hall
School to remain open.
Members noted:
·
The school currently only one child on the school roll, who was due to move to secondary
provision at the end of this academic year, and from September 2023 the school
would have no pupils on roll.
·
The
school site and building were privately owned and therefore the Authority had
no say in its future use.
·
Once
there was talk of a possible closure, parents tended to vote with their feet,
which was frustrating but the Authority had no option but to follow the
prescribed process.
Members
agreed it would be helpful in the future if the early warning signs of a possible
closure could be communicated with Councillors (and Parish Councillors) on a
confidential basis.
Having taken account of all the information provided, the Executive reluctantly agreed the reasons for the proposal to close the school as laid out in the report, were correct and that closure of the school would be in the best interest of the future education of pupils in the area.
With that in mind, they voted unanimously in favour of the recommendations, and it was
Resolved – That:
i. Statutory proposals and notices be
published on 30 March 2023 proposing to cease to maintain Skelton Newby Hall CE
Primary School with effect from 31 August 2023; and proposing that the
catchment area of Kirby Hill CE VC be expanded with effect from 1 September
2023 to serve the area currently served by Skelton Newby Hall CE VC School.
ii. a
final decision on those proposals be scheduled for the Executive meeting on 30
May 2023.
Supporting documents: