Presentation from the Senior Transport
Planning Officer.
Minutes:
The following statement was read out by Mark Codman
(Democratic Services) on behalf of Gia Margolis (Harrogate District Cycle
Action):
“Good Morning
At successive ACC
meetings Councillors have asked for updates on active travel schemes.
For many years
Harrogate District Cycle Action has tried to help officers deliver on active
travel. Yet there has been and continues to be a systemic failure to deliver
any of these schemes.
At a recent meeting
a senior transport officer observed “that the council’s budget for active
travel has been slashed since austerity in 2010, leaving little wriggle room to
deliver schemes without additional government funding”. Yet the same officer
then declared how successful the council had been in winning government funds
for active travel.
The undisputable
fact is that the County Council has received many millions of pounds of
government funding most of which has been spent – and much of it apparently
wasted - on consultants with virtually no delivery of any significant scheme.
The following are
examples of three small schemes which should have been delivered but still have
no timetable for delivery.
1.
The
Wetherby Road crossing from Slingsby Walk to Willaston
Road by the hospital, is a vital missing link in the cycle network, proposed
and discussed for over a decade and fully funded since 2021. Discussions,
reports, consultations continue . There is still no timetable.
2.
The
Oatlands Drive crossing. No timetable.
3. The
Bilton Lane raised table to the Greenway. A very
small scheme for which contractors were booked to start work in August 2023. It
was then discovered that another consultation was required and in January 2024
it was revealed that a safety audit, which officers were told last year wasn’t
needed, was in fact required. That process has still to take place.
Other larger cycle
schemes have all been abandoned - for example the A59 Knaresborough Road,
Victoria Avenue, Beech Grove, Otley Road Phase 2, Oatlands Drive.
There are officers
who are keen to deliver projects but it appears that the processes to ensure
delivery in a timely way simply don’t exist, that and the lack of meaningful
support from senior management add up to a systemic problem which will almost
certainly continue to slow or prevent delivery for the foreseeable future.
What questions are
you going to ask of the leadership team of the ongoing failure of any delivery
of any project despite the millions of funding received over the last few
years? And what changes will you seek to ensure North Yorkshire at last becomes
a champion of active travel rather than a failing authority, as reflected,
regrettably but deservedly, in its very low rating with Active Travel England.
Mark Codman (Democratic Services) read out the following
statement on behalf of the Council’s Highways officers:
“North Yorkshire Council is committed to delivering active
travel schemes and that commitment and particular demand in Harrogate has been
demonstrated by a newly created post to have oversight and manage these
schemes. The new Improvement project delivery manager joined the team in
November and whilst only being in post for just over four months has helped
ensure focused delivery and progress amongst a demanding service delivery
requirement across the local team. In previous updates to the ACC the local
team have provided information regarding challenges on delivery time scales and
the reason for these and details of mitigation measures and next steps.
As well as the active travel updates to ACC meetings the
team also ensure the local members are updated with key milestones of the
projects. The local team met with Harrogate and District Cycle Action Group in
January and agreed to focus meetings every 3 months to facilitate information
sharing and updates the specific sites highlighted were discussed at that
meeting and have also been brought to the team's attention through a separate
channel in an email from Mrs Margolis, updates for the scheme's reference are
as follows;
-
the Wetherby Road and Oatland's Crossing points
- officers advised Mrs Margolis in January that discussions were required with
third party landowners that these had been had and that they would be engaging
with necessary stakeholders and residents and businesses in the vicinity of the
works from the end of this month of March. We also advise that there are legal
processes to complete which must be concluded before works can start on site.
The team are working on a program of program for delivery in the coming
financial year and will provide a more detailed update when there is more
certainty around the construction program.
-
Bilton Lane Crossing -
whilst a relatively simple scheme to physically deliver it has not been supported
by all. Contractors lined up as part of the forward planning exercise to
deliver following a consultation. As shared with Mrs Margolis in January there
were a number of objections raised in relation to the
proposals and a road safety audit has been requested to review the issues
raised and allow the team to consider mitigations this independent audit will
help officers ensure risks are adequately mitigated which is in the best
interest for all parties
-
Victoria Avenue and Oatlands drive - updates
were provided to Mrs Margolis and the Harrogate District Cycle Action group in
January. Consultation for Victoria Avenue will commence in the spring with a
public engagement event to discuss the designs proposed. Design work has
commenced for the Oatland's Drive 20 mph implementation and next steps for a
wider scheme on Oatlands Drive are currently in discussion.
-
Beech Grove and Otley Road Phase 2 - whilst it
was determined that Beech Grove load traffic neighbourhood scheme and Otley
Road Phase 2 would not commence alternatives have been identified such as the
proposed 20 mph implementation in the area and the sustainable transport
package which addresses a range of active travel enhancements. Updates for both
these projects which will feature on the May ACC agenda.”
Alex Kay (Senior Transport Planning Officer) attended the
meeting remotely and began his
presentation by covering key points including an update on current Active
Travel development progress, further schemes that were being considered and
potential funding routes. The information would enable the Committee to
consider potential projects to prioritise in the £50k fund allocation for the
ACC.
The presentation
began by giving an overview of key Active Travel national guidance and how that
informed active travel development in the Harrogate District. The presentation
advised that key corridor routes were in early stage
planning for walking routes but were at feasibility design stage for key
cycling corridor routes. The presentation went on to give detail about budget
and indicative costs for key proposed cycle corridor routes, these were early stage estimates but would enable the Council to begin
bidding for funding. Key funding routes for the proposed schemes could
potentially be accessed from several sources with the Future Active Travel Fund
Tranche and Local Transport Fund being highlighted.
-
In
response to a question from Councillor Lacey, Alex Kay explained that a value
for money rating of 1:6 meant that for every pound invested six pounds would be
returned. The key highlighted schemes were the most advanced in design and
therefor the closest to being bid ready and the bidding that was being
discussed was for external money.
-
In
response to a question from Councillor Haslam, Alex Kay advised that he would
be able to provide information on uplifts to walking and cycling related to the
proposed schemes and he would happily consider any ‘quick wins’ that Members
proposed.
-
In
response to a question from Councillor Walker, Alex Kay responded that money had
previously been awarded for five
proposed schemes, those schemes had not, however, progressed and had now become
unaffordable. The Council was in discussion with Active Travel England to use
the money previously won for the Victoria Avenue Scheme. The Council had
progressed the A59 scheme to the feasibility stage but the remaining £250K had
been directed to another scheme under the advice of Active Travel England. In
terms of learned lessons the Council was now in good
dialogue with Active Travel England and was hopeful of future success in terms
of bidding for funding and delivery of schemes.
-
In
response to Councillor Haslam, Alex Kay advised that he would
look at the proposal to join Killinghall to the Nidderdale Greenway, he
would develop a proposal and costs and return to the Committee with further
detail.
-
In
response to a question from Councillor Broadbank
regarding rising costs Alex explained that rising costs were in part due to
inflation but also increasing standards of design relating to walking and cycle
routes.
Members had further
discussion regarding quick wins and improvements including improvements to
signage and repairing of potholes. Mark Codman (Scrutiny, Governance and Risk
Manager) advised that there would be an informal meeting of the committee to
consider priority projects for consideration for the 50k fund allocation for
the ACC where Members would have the opportunity to scrutinise proposed schemes
in more detail and would be able to propose quick wins to the Active Travel
Team.
The Chair thanked Alex for attending.