Minutes:
The recommendations
at page 38 of the agenda pack (pages 1474 of the Minute Book) were moved and
seconded.
1.
The
following amendment to the recommendations was moved by Councillor Andrew
Timothy and seconded by Councillor Monika Slater:
Remove item 7.1.(iv) - “to
remove travel assistance to children attending designated religious character
primary schools as part of the future travel policy.”
The reason behind the amendment was that religion, belief, or lack
thereof was a protected characteristic under the 2010 Equality Act. The proposer and seconder therefore contended
that no family, regardless of socio-economic background, should be required to
send their children to a religious primary school, or prevented from doing the
same, through the requirement to pay for, or otherwise arrange, transport to
any school which was not the geographically closest school.
Proposer – Councillor Andrew Timothy
Seconder – Councillor Monika Slater
The amendment was
then debated.
On a vote being
taken the motion was declared defeated with 15 votes for, 55 against and 4
abstentions.
2.
The
following amendment to the recommendations was moved by Councillor Bryn
Griffiths and seconded by Councillor Hannah Gostlow:
Remove recommendation vi) from Para 7.1 - “amend the criterion to match
the statutory requirement, meaning that in future eligibility on catchment
grounds would no longer apply as part of the future travel policy.”
The reason behind the amendment was that the proposer and seconder
contended that the climate change implications in the supporting documentation
were flawed – they only considered those pertaining to North Yorkshire Council
and did not include those arising from increased effects on the consequential
public travel. Further, the report
stated that it was not possible to provide an accurate estimate of the carbon
dioxide savings that would be achieved.
Proposer – Councillor Bryn Griffiths
Seconder – Councillor Hannah Gostlow
The amendment was
then debated.
On a vote being
taken the motion was declared defeated with 20 votes for, 52 against and 2
abstentions.
Debate then ensued on
the substantive motion.
It was moved and seconded that Council now move to the vote and on a vote
being taken 71 Members voted for the motion, 2 voted against and there was 1
abstention.
A named vote was requested and over 20 Members stood to request the
named vote. The motion was declared
carried with 48 votes for, 26 votes against and no abstentions.
For: Councillors
Karl Arthur, Alyson Baker, Derek Bastiman, Eric Broadbent, John Cattanach,
David Chance, Liz Colling, Mark Crane, Gareth Dadd, Caroline Dickinson, Keane
Duncan, Richard Foster, Sam Gibbs, Caroline Goodrick, Tim Grogan, Michael
Harrison, David Hugill, Nathan Hull, George Jabbour, Tom Jones, Nigel Knapton,
Andrew Lee, Cliff Lunn, John Mann, Heather Moorhouse, Simon Myers, Bob Packham,
Andy Paraskos, Clive Pearson, Heather Phillips, Jack Proud, Janet Sanderson,
Karin Sedgwick, Subash Sharma, Steve Shaw-Wright, Neil Swannick, Roberta
Swiers, Malcolm Taylor, Angus Thompson, Philip Trumper, Steve Watson, David
Webster, John Weighell OBE, Greg White, Annabel Wilkinson, Peter Wilkinson,
Andrew Williams and Robert Windass.
Against: Councillors Philip Broadbank, Andy Brown,
Lindsay Burr MBE, Sam Cross, Michelle Donohue-Moncrieff, Kevin Foster, Hannah
Gostlow, Bryn Griffiths, Paul Haslam, Robert Heseltine, David Ireton, Janet
Jefferson, Mike Jordan, Peter Lacey, Rich Maw, John McCartney, Andrew Murday,
David Noland, Stuart Parsons, Tony Randerson, Dan Sladden, Monika Slater, David
Staveley, Andrew Timothy, Matt Walker and Arnold Warneken.
Resolved –
i)
to retain this extended eligibility in reception year as part of the future
travel policy.
ii)
to retain this extended eligibility in Year 3 as part of the future travel
policy.
iii)
to remove transport assistance to second address as part of the future travel
policy.
iv)
to remove travel assistance to children attending designated religious
character primary schools as part of the future travel policy.
v) a
proposal that travel on transition is assessed on a case-by-case basis in
accordance with the EHCP as part of the future policy.
vi)
amend the criterion to match the statutory requirement, meaning that in future
eligibility on catchment grounds would no longer apply as part of the future
travel policy.
vii)
use its discretionary powers to extend the eligibility for travel assistance
for secondary age pupils from low income families to attend one of their three
nearest suitable schools provided it is more than 2 miles but not more than 12
miles (an increase from 6 miles) from their home as part of the future travel
policy.
(In accordance with her declaration at Minute 94,
Councillor Yvonne Peacock withdrew from the meeting during the debate and
determination of this item).
Supporting documents: