Members of the public may ask questions or make statements at this meeting if they have given notice to Elizabeth Jackson, Principal Democratic Services Officer Elizabeth.jackson@northyorks.gov.uk , and supplied the text by midday on Thursday 15 August, three working days before the day of the meeting. Each speaker should limit themselves to 3 minutes on any item. Members of the public who have given notice will be invited to speak:
· at this point in the meeting if their questions/statements relate to matters which are not otherwise on the Agenda (subject to an overall time limit of 30 minutes);
· when the relevant Agenda item is being considered if they wish to speak on a matter which is on the Agenda for this meeting.
If you are exercising your right to speak at this meeting, but do not
wish to be recorded, please inform the Leader who will instruct anyone who may
be taking a recording to cease while you speak.
Minutes:
A public statement was received from the North Yorkshire Climate Coalition in relation to Minute 519 – North Yorkshire Council Climate Change Strategy Delivery Pathway. Bridget Holmstrom attended the meeting to read out the statement, as follows:
I am speaking as
a member of the Steering Group of the North Yorkshire Climate Coalition, which
represents 25 local climate and environmental groups across the county. I’d like to make some observations about the
report and the climate change delivery pathway being presented today for
adoption.
Firstly, we’d
like to welcome the renewed affirmation in this report of the Council’s
commitment to play a net zero leadership role in line with its adoption of the
Yorkshire & Humber Climate Commission pledge. We fully agree with the report’s emphasis on
the co-benefits of climate action, e.g. in terms of health, skills development
and energy and food security.
With regard to
pathway actions, we remain most concerned by the lack of top-level, specific
metrics against which progress will be measured and monitored, and therefore
included in future quarterly performance reports to the Executive. We hope that this shortcoming can be speedily
rectified. We are also concerned at the
lack of progress on local climate resilience.
We must quickly adapt to live with climate change.
Today’s report
includes a proposal in para 8.3 to involve NY Climate Coalition as an ‘external
reference body’ in overseeing the delivery of the pathway. We welcome this proposal and can confirm that
we are keen to partner with the Council in delivering the aim of being
operational net zero by 2030. While we
may not always agree on the best way of achieving this goal, we are committed
to playing a constructive role. We hope
that the Executive will endorse this proposal.
To this end, we
will also engage with key members of the Council, including Councillor Greg
White in his role as the relevant portfolio owner. We want to pay tribute to the committed
efforts of Councillor Paul Haslam as the Council’s former Climate Champion, and
we look forward very much to working in as productive a manner with his
successor, Councillor David Hugill.
At the same
time, we will endeavour to bring local climate groups together, share good
practice and help the community sector across the county to play a full part in
the enormous task of decarbonisation by all households, businesses, and
communities over the coming years.
Councillor Greg
White, Executive Member for Managing our Environment, thanked the Climate Coalition
for their continued engagement, their support on actions on climate change, and
also their statement to Executive. The Council is keen to continue working with
all stakeholders in helping to tackle this important issue. Whilst I note and welcome the overall support
nature of the statement; I do want to respond to a few points that you have
raised. By doing so I can address the
items you raised in your statement, and introduce this item for further
consideration.
Given the overall
challenge in bringing together the Unitary Council, there are competing calls
on council resources and that climate change necessarily has to form part of
that. I am pleased with the progress Officers have made to date although we all
recognise there is a lot more to do. We need additional progress on several
points. Firstly, we need stronger data
and emission reporting – we cannot claim to be tackling an issue if we cannot
track progress; secondly, the actions in the Delivery Pathway do need more
precision and focus. I’ve been speaking with relevant Officers, there is
agreement on these two points and I am assured that we will see progress in
future update reports.
As for your point
on local climate resilience, this is an issue that affects all residents in
North Yorkshire cutting across all aspects of life from extreme weather events
to helping restore nature. In addition to the obvious proactive initiatives,
like facilitating the rollout of battery powered cars, by investing in a
network of public charging points, the Council can also help play a part in
tackling the impact of climate change when they happen, and anticipating them
happening, by investing in infrastructure projects. I can draw attention to two current examples
– the A59 Kex Gill Realignment, costing around £68.5m and Filey Coastal Defence
repair scheme which is underway, costing around £3m. These are just some
examples that sit amongst many – hopefully it reassures that again, we
recognise the issue and the need to take action.