To receive an update on the local bus services in the Committee area.
Minutes:
· Due to the impacts of a significant
increase in operating costs, along with national difficulties recruiting bus
drivers there had been some service reductions across the county.
·
The bus company Arriva had closed their Wakefield depot, where the bulk
of engineering work for the area was undertaken, due to structural issues which
had come to light with the building.
·
There had been a number of service changes in
the Selby area in July 2024, mainly on the routes operated by Arriva, due to
congestion on the route into York which had led to a slight reduction in the
frequency on some bus timetables.
·
The Coastliner service operating between
Leeds, York and the East Coast had suffered difficulties with reliability,
however additional resources had been put into the service; from the 27 October
the service would see an increase in the frequency of buses to three per hour,
running every 20 minutes between Leeds, Tadcaster and York.
·
Additional resources were being put into Service 476, Selby to
Pontefract, and 164, Leeds to Sherburn in Elmet to Selby routes from February
2025, with additional journeys to the Sherburn in Elmet Industrial Estate.
·
A fare cap of £1 per journey for young people under the age of 19 had
been put in place until the end of December 2024.
·
Following the Bus Service Improvement Plan (BSIP3) allocation of funding
in 2024/25, North Yorkshire were currently waiting to see what funding would be
made available for 2025/26 and onwards.
· Following the creation of the York and
North Yorkshire Combined Authority (CA) and the election of a Mayor in May
2024, the CA had overall strategic responsibility for public transport, with
the day-to-day operational functions being delegated to NYC and the City of
York Councils. Future funding from
government would be paid to the CA, who would lead on the creation of a new
joint Bus Service Improvement Plan for York and North Yorkshire from 2025
onwards.
Discussion took place around the
possibility of franchising bus services.
The Leader, Councillor Les, who was in attendance, advised Members that
the Mayor had not reached a view on the franchising
model as yet, and that the Mayor’s office had recently received a list of dates
for the next cycle of NY Area Committee’s, therefore the AC should invite the
Mayor to the next available meeting.
One Member highlighted that a local
parish council had investigated the possibility of buying a minibus and queried
if there would be any financial support for such a venture. The officer confirmed that potentially there
could be and advised the Member on two grant schemes which were available to
support this kind of scheme.
Members confirmed that they would like to
leave the bus travel item on each AC agenda, however this could take the form
of a short, written update unless something strategically significant were to
take place, in which case Members would like an officer to attend the meeting.
The Chair thanked the officer for his
attendance at the meeting and the updates provided.
Resolved:
That the report be noted.
Supporting documents: