Purpose: To provide a highways update on the delivery of active travel projects across North Yorkshire.
Minutes:
Considered:
A report of the Corporate Director –
Business & Environmental Services, providing a highways update on the
delivery of active travel projects across North Yorkshire.
Louise Neale, Transport
Planning Team Leader introduced the update, and provided an overview of the DfT funding bids made by NYCC, as detailed in section 3 of
the report, and went on to outline:
·
The Authority’s strategic
approach to walking and cycling improvements, and its commitment to developing
a LCWIP for the main urban centre within each District.
·
The key outputs of an
LCWIP i.e. a cycling and walking network; a priorities programme of
infrastructure; and a report that set out the narrative behind the
prioritisation of the routes.
·
A number of LCWIPS in
place / being drawn up for various districts across the County;
She drew attention to the Authority’s
Capability Fund allocation, which would be used to
review and update some of the early LCWIPS produced, as detailed in section 5
of the report. It was
noted this had replaced the Government’s previous Access Fund, and that
the funding would be used to carry out an LCWIP review and to provide
Bikeability training in schools.
In regard to the development of travel plans, she confirmed two new sustainable
travel officers were to be recruited to work with developers and schools to
develop travel plans and to carry out a marketing and promotion campaign across
North Yorkshire to promote active travel.
She also drew attention to the Governments
latest Local Transport Note providing updated guidance on delivering high
quality cycle infrastructure, and the new Highway Design Guidance being
produced by the Highway Authority’s Development Management Team, taking account
of all National Planning Policy Framework revisions in recent years, which the
LAF would be consulted on in due course.
Finally, she confirmed that Network Strategy
Teams would continue to engage with the LAF at the appropriate time on future
relevant projects, such as the forthcoming Catterick
LCWIP.
In response to
Forum questions, Louise Neale confirmed:
·
A LCWIP was being
developed for Northallerton;
·
Modelling work on
Hambleton’s Local Plan was ongoing;
·
Work was underway on a
Levelling Up Fund bid for Thirsk, with the aim of improving access to the train
station;
·
Routes were designed by
the Authority’s engineers in consultation with WSP (Framework Consultants) and
safety audits were carried out on all new routes, taking account of the safety
of users etc – it was noted this was all tied down by the design guidance and
the safety standards therein, which NYCC had to regularly challenge due to the
many restrictions and constrained spaces on its network;
·
When a new route was
planned that was likely to be considered a public rights of way, it would be
discussed with the Countryside Access Service to consider whether it would be
appropriate to add it to the definitive map;
Forum members
noted that equestrians often had no other option but to use busy roads to traverse
urban areas to reach local bridleways and quieter lanes, and suggested there
should be no assumption that equestrians would not use such routes. They also recognised the difficulties of
meeting national guidelines but suggested that as North Yorkshire was a
predominantly rural county, with a high number of horses owned and used not
just for leisure purposes, there had to be a way of better incorporating them
into both the ROW and highways network.
They also requested a more pro-active stance on engaging and consulting
with stables and riding schools based in the vicinity of
any new routes proposed.
Finally, as the DfT
was a Section 94 body, Rachel Connolly suggested the Forum write to them to
stress the importance of them taking a more inclusive approach to LCWIPs.
The Chair thanked Louise Neale for the report,
and her attendance at the meeting, and it was
Resolved: That:
i. The report be noted;
ii.
Rachel Connolly draft a letter to the DfT on the lack of inclusivity on Government’s strategy on
LCWIPs to be sent on behalf of the Forum;
Supporting documents: