Items
| No. |
Item |
1. |
Appointment of Chair
Minutes:
The Assistant Chief Executive (Legal and Democratic
Services) outlined the process for appointing the Chair of the Committee as set
out in the Constitution and indicated that this should be a representative of
the Council’s Executive.
Resolved
That Councillor Derek Bastiman be appointed Chair of the
Development Plan Committee.
|
2. |
Welcome, introductions and apologies
Minutes:
The Chairman
welcomed everyone to the meeting of this Committee, and informed Members that
the meeting was being recorded, therefore they would need to introduce
themselves when speaking and would need to use the microphones.
|
3. |
Appointment of Vice-Chair
Minutes:
Resolved
That Councillor Andy Paraskos be appointed Vice-Chair of the
Development Plan Committee.
|
4. |
Declarations of interest
Minutes:
There were no declarations of interest.
|
5. |
Terms of Reference and Remit of Committee - Verbal report of the Assistant Chief Executive (Legal and Democratic Services)
Minutes:
The Assistant Chief Executive, Legal and Democratic Services
outlined details of the remit for the Committee and the Terms of Reference for
the Committee were circulated.
A representative of the Assistant
Director Planning – Community Development Services provided details of the
role, purpose and priorities of the Committee.
Resolved
That the Terms of Reference and issues raised be noted.
|
6. |
Selby District Local Plan - Revised Regulation 19 (Publication version) draft plan for public consultation - Report of the Corporate Director of Community Development PDF 144 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Considered - the report of the Assistant Director Planning –
Community Development Services setting out the options which had been
considered in progressing the Selby District Local Plan and setting out the
recommendation to undertake a further consultation on a revised Regulation 19
Publication Local Plan.
The report highlighted the following:
- The four options which had
been considered for progressing the Local Plan for the former Selby
district area based on recent Counsel advice and making a recommendation
to undertake a six-week consultation on a revised Publication Local Plan
(PLP).
- The revised plan removed
the proposed new settlement known as Heronby,
added three further site allocations, including revisions to policies in
response to comments raised as part of the previous consultation stage and
any changes required following the publication of the revised National
Planning Policy Framework in December 2023.
- A consultation on the
Publication Local Plan took place between August and October 2022. In
total 409 individual responses were received to the consultation, with 202
in relation to a new settlement proposal at Heronby.
- The majority of responses
to the Heronby New Settlement proposal were
objections based on adverse traffic impact on the A19 and the wider local
highway network, impact on the ancient woodland, impact on climate change,
the loss of agricultural land and development of greenfield land. Concerns
were also raised about the lack of access to employment opportunities and
assertions that new housing should be sited in the more affordable areas
of the district. City of York Council (CYC) raised concerns based on the
highway modelling undertaken stating that the duty to cooperate had not
been fulfilled, National Highways had raised concerns in relation to the
A19/A64 trip rates, internalisation rates within the site and phasing of
infrastructure improvements.
- As a result, legal advice
was sought from Counsel on the options available to the Council in
relation to the Selby Local Plan in the light of objections which had been
made to proposals for a new settlement.
The four options considered were:
Ø
Option 1: Proceed to submission of the Plan in
its current form with inclusion of Heronby
Ø
Option 2: Proceed to submission of the Plan in
its current form but on the basis that NYC would propose the removal of Heronby as a Main Modification
Ø
Option 3: Undertake further Consultation on an
amended PLP which does not include Heronby
Ø
Option 4 Not proceed with further work on the
Selby Local Plan and instead to address the need through NYC’s own Local Plan
- In order to progress the
Local Plan with Heronby included as an
allocation the City of York Council concerns on highways matters would
need to be satisfactorily addressed.
- Further discussions had
taken place and the views of both NYC and CYC highways were that they were
unable to support the scheme based on the information that was currently
available. This did not mean that issues could not be adequately addressed
in the longer term, however it was the ... view the full minutes text for item 6.
|
7. |
Maltkiln new settlement – Submission of the New Settlement (Maltkiln) Development Plan Document - Report of the Corporate Director of Community Development. PDF 197 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Considered – the report of the Assistant Director Planning –
Community Development Services requesting Members:
a)
Consider the content of the Regulation 19 Draft
New Settlement (Maltkiln) Development Plan Document
(DPD) and accompanying submission documents and seek renewed agreement for
submission to the Secretary of State for public
b)
examination; and
c)
Agree the process of decision making during the
Examination in respect of agreeing modifications to the Plan and responding to
questions from the Inspector (including the provision of supporting statements
and documentation).
The report highlighted the following:
- The development of a new
settlement known as Maltkiln was a key part of
the Harrogate District Local Plan’s growth strategy, providing much needed
homes and jobs in a sustainable location along the York-Harrogate-Leeds
rail line.
- The broad location of the
new settlement was established in the Harrogate District Local Plan
(adopted 2020), but the Plan states that the boundary, form and nature of
the new settlement would be set through a development plan document (DPD).
- A draft DPD hads now been prepared setting a thirty-year vision
for Maltkiln and a policy framework to guide how
it is developed, underpinned by evidence base work, community involvement
and public consultation.
- The next and final stage
of the DPD process was submission to the secretary of state for an
examination in public, allowing independent scrutiny of the DPD and allow
a further chance for communities and stakeholders to influence the process
and the final DPD.
- If adopted, the DPD would
provide a robust framework for the Council to guide and manage the
long-term development of Maltkiln.
- The former Harrogate
Borough Council in September 2022 published a Regulation 19 consultation
and submitted the DPD for examination following that. The decision still
has legal standing, but given the time that has
elapsed for the reasons set out in the report it was felt prudent to seek
re-confirmation of that decision. This report also provided an opportunity
to present and agree the final submission documents.
- The draft DPD set a clear
and ambitious vision for Maltkiln and a policy
framework to guide how it is developedcreatinga
mixed-use settlement, where people have access to homes, a range of
employment types, local services and facilities, public transport and open
spaces, focussed around the Cattal rail station and the new local centre
enabling the residents to benefit from key walking, cycling and public
transport corridors.
- Preparation of Development
Plan Documents is governed by planning legislation and progression of the
DPD through the final stages of the process would allow the Council to
give increased weight to the Plan in the determination of planning
applications. If adopted, full weight can be given to DPDs allowing the
Council to drive development of the new settlement in a comprehensive
manner.
- Upon submission, the
Secretary of State appoints an Inspector to carry out an independent
examination of the DPD, dealt with by the Planning Inspectorate. The
process was detailed in the report.
- Resultant modifications
would be for Full Council (with ... view the full minutes text for item 7.
|
8. |
Other business which the Chairman agrees should be considered as a matter of urgency because of special circumstances
Minutes:
There were no items of urgent business.
|